Sikh youth wearing kirpan (holy sword) denied entry at Supreme Court, Delhi (India)

Five beloved Singhnis - 1

I feel ashamed to be called an Indian Sikh but why? Read here.

Today in the evening at about 4 o’clock i was called by someone from facebook and informed that an Amritdhari Sikh wearing all his 5 mandatory signs of Sikh religion was stopped to enter Supreme court, Delhi. The security staff was insisting him to remove his Kirpan.

I was shocked to hear it. He wanted to know what he should do in such circumstances. When he asked the security staff to give them in writing the reason of denying him entry, they refused. That shows them biased. At this  I replied him that this unfortunate incident must be getting recorded in CCTV so he shouldn’t worry. If he is asked for not attending the court, he should simply state the reason. CCTV footage will prove him innocent.

If the security staff violates article 25(B) of indian constitution, are they not supposed to be held liable for offending rights of a citizen? If any such circular is issued by Indian gov or an amendment in constitution is made that Sikhs wearing can not enter in any Court of law, it should be displayed and such notice should be published in newspapers too?

But then i requested him to get help of any Sikh advocate. To my amusement, i was shocked to listen his words that Sikh lawyers at supreme Court too suggested him to remove kirpan (religious sword) and come inside?

To hell with such Sikh lawyers. What justice they could provide to their clients if they are not able to argue with security staff and convince them that kirpan is an article of faith and constitution of India permits Sikhs to wear it and move freely anywhere they wish. if an Advocate can’t deal with this issue what hope is there of credible representation inside the Court by him?

I am not sure as time was not permitting me to raise this issue with dumb body of Sikhs known as DSGMC but is there anybody noticing this shameful incident?

Now, let us take a look at Article 25:

Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion —

(1)   Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion.

(2)   Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law –

(a)   regulating or restricting any economic, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice;(b)   providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus. 

Explanation I – The wearing and carrying of kirpans shall be deemed to be included in the profession of the Sikh religion. 

Explanation II – In sub-Clause (b) of clause (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly.

Ajmer kesri

Ajmer Singh Randhawa

One Response to “Sikh youth wearing kirpan (holy sword) denied entry at Supreme Court, Delhi (India)”

  1. asrandhawa Says:

    Advocate Dalveer Kaur writes on a verdict by Allahabad High Court in reference to my post in which i invited attention of Sikh nation when a Sikh youth was denied entry in Supreme Court at Delhi for wearing Kirpan. He was asked to remove it. Please keep a note of it for future reference if any.

    See the comment;

    Though there r not any specific case filed in this regard but we can take the example of “Rex – versus – Dhyan Singh” (AIR 1952 Allahabad, 53) arose under the provisions of U.P. Arms Act in 1948, and was decided by the Allahabad High Court in 1952. When the Appeal came to the High Court, the Constitution of India had come into operation, giving right to the Sikhs to wear and carry kirpans under Article 25. After referring to the religious literature of the Sikhs, the High Court had held that a Sikh is entitled to wear and carry kirpan, as Guru Gobind Singh had ordained the Sikhs to wear always five K’s, i.e., kesh, kangha, kirpan, kachh and kara, which indicates one of these signs. So a Sikh can be allowed to wear and carry one kirpan on their person as being a part of their religion and religious practice, and the same is so protected under Article 25 of the Constitution of India.

    Thanks to Dalveer kaur ji while cursing the Sikh advocates at Supreme court who suggested to remove the Kirpan and enter.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: