False propaganda against Sikh by Congress in election time.

April 19, 2014

A report was published in NewYork times on 3rd April 1984 by Sanjay Hazarika. In this report he gives the number of people killed in Punjab during peak militancy in two years as 300 though we should condemn each and every single murder of every innocent but Congress govt. carried out Operation bluestar to flush out militants from Golden temple and 43 other Sikh Gurudwaras (places of worship). Indira govt. then alleged killings of hindus during militancy in punjab was over 35,000.

Lal Krishan Adwani, President Bhartiya Janta Party lead a protest march in Delhi and persuaded Indira to attack on Darbar Sahib also known as gilden Temple. He himself confessed in his autobiography, ‘My country my life’ that he put pressure on Indira to attack. 

But when this news of NewYork Times came in front of me, i immediately decided to share it with you as it’s an evidence that the killings and worst conditions of law and order were falsely propagated in Punjab to justify attack on Golden temple whereas it’s already  proved that the preparations to attack by army were already going on in hills of Chakrata nearly 340 kms from Delhi, for the last 18 months and soldiers were given training on a replica of this sanctum sanctorum. It only proves the anti-Sikh policy of Congress govt. which had enmity with Sikhs since 1975 when Sikhs in Punjab opposed emergency and raised their voice against dictatorship of Indira Gandhi.

Some reports were also published in Tribune Punjab which denied any hand of Sikh militants in killings of innocent Hindus but held responsible to Indian agencies to defame Sikhs and then take action to eliminate them. It only exposes lust of power and rule of Congress by indira Gandhi who disturbed Punjab and organized these killings to prove her savior of Hinus whereas she herself embraced Islam, married to Feroz (a parsi muslim) and adopted new name MAIMUNA BEGUM.

Tribune newspaper on 11-11-83 printed a report called ‘Discovery of Turbans’ written by Dr. Lalawati & I.S Iyangar thought to believe in this that the passengers “Hindus” were dragged out of the bus and killed was not work of the real Kharku’s (Militants) but work of the non- kharkus who happens to be dressed like Sikhs and were wearing Turbans.  As Darbar Sahib complex was garrisoned along with other Gurudwara’s every person going in and out was searched properly including ration as it was believed that so called Terrorists were hiding in the Darbar Sahib Complex and they would come out and kill innocent Hindus and go back in hiding.  List of 40 Singh’s with proper names was sent to center Govt. and C.R.P, B.S.F & Punjab police along with few intelligence agencies were on the spot to catch these Singh’s but during 18 months of Garrison they failed to arrest or catch EVEN one Singh with so called weapons or Singh’s killing any innocent Hindu.  

So now the Question is who were killing these innocent Hindus?  Comrades being revolutionaries yet the ass lickers of the Govt. of India were on the pay roll to provide information of any Singh whom they did not like so for job security they were giving names of innocent Sikh youths who were taken to Police Stations, extorted for money, tortured and eventually killed.  State sponsored Terrorism was at it’s best and to date properties of these Singh’s have been taken over by Police officials and few has been turned into Police Stations or such.  If Govt. of Punjab and Comrades are so pure human being than why human rights organizations were not allowed in Punjab to tell the world truth?  Let’s not forget Shahid Jaswant Singh Khalra a human right’s activist who exposed 25000 deaths of innocents from the cremation grounds by the Punjab Police just in one district of Punjab.  All these boys and their families were extorted for money during repeated arrests, tortured, female members of the family were gang raped, their are living victims who have stated that they were stripped butt naked and were forced to lie down on their father and much more went on and yet these comrades are talking about bringing what revolution with their lies of Kharku’s killing innocent Hindus? Jaswant Singh Khalra revealed how a 3 yrs old boy was also cut open and peppers were stuffed in his wounds and eventually boy died.  And nobody would want to be repeatedly torture to such extend or humiliated so few boys un willingly ran out of their homes and joined the real Kharkus for revenge and gave the hell to the forces of State sponsored terrorism now the deal was handful vs. the whole state funded by A country and they gave the real MATCH for these goons in uniforms. Back to Question how did some of the fake Kharkus that who created them? Sarab Hind Congress i issued a report ‘Conspiracy Exposed’ and was printed in Indian Express dated September 4, 1984 which stated “Pakistani agents disguised as Sikh were trained in Kasur area of Pakistan by brigadier artillery regiment.  These men, in batches of 300 – 400 were given there to four months intensive training.  Most of those trained in these camps & training centers were smugglers, proclaimed offenders and criminals….”  There were other active centers and they were brought in via Rajisthan border.

S.M. Sathananthan Managing editor Transatlantic India on 15-12-83 wrote under article “Hindu-Sikh Conflict in Punjab, causes and cure” in this he writes ‘Sikh leaders claim  that the recent killings of innocent Hindus in the bus, near the border were not committed by the Sikhs, appears to be credible and thought provoking’ May 1985 Magazine Surya on page 42 writes something like this “Mrs. Gandhi had decided that she was to take on the new role in her life the role of the protector of Hindus…. She had planned that there shall be a conflict between the Hindus & Sikhs, in which the grand strategy was that the Hindus shall be first left unprotected, let them be killed for a while, let them become angry, so angry that they will seek revenge.  The Hindus & Sikhs will then go at each other’s throat.  and then I will tell the Hindus, ‘Look I can only protect you.”

More than 300 people have been killed in Punjab since the latest series of violence began in the summer of 1982. Of this figure at least 50 people were slain in clashes between Sikhs, Hindus and the police during an outbreak of violence in February.

If only 300 people were killed in violence within two years, i wonder if BJP+RSS were so terrorized that Adwani led a march to persue Indira Gandhi to attack on Golden temple? He himself confessed that he persuaded Indira in his book ‘MY LIFE MY COUNTRY’. It seems Indira also took it threat to peace and harmony of nation so it took suicidal step to attack on Darbar sahib but It’s Radio and TV channel propagated killing of thousands of Hindus in Punjab. 
http://www.nytimes.com/1984/04/03/world/sikh-gunmen-kill-hindu-in-punjab.html

By looking this report, it gets clear that Indira Gandhi had one mission in life to see rule of Congress in every state, she played malicious moves, used article 356 frequently to uproot the state govts and impose President rule and form Congress govt after fresh elections in which govt. machinery was used to benefit her goal.This report also certify the reports of Tribune. Both of these prestigeous news papers have given true reports. Had indira not helped Gurbachan singh Nirankari to escape Delhi after he killed 13 Sikhs in Punjab, the seeds of militancy would have never been sown and she had not to pay  a heavy price. Not only she but whole India still paying the price and shall always pay as Sikhs shall never for get Operation Bluestar and Sikh genocide in same year 1984.

Capt. Amrinder Singh  is trying to woo max. Hindu votes by raising the issues of past by highlighting congress.. saviors of Hindus in Punjab…It is election time again and every candidate who is taking part in the election, is ready to tell any kind of nonsense and rubbish. Captain Amrinder has done the same too Because as a experienced politician and very loyal of Congress Party he knows very well that he has got no chance to be elected in the coming election by the vast majority of Sikh voters because of the Sikh Genocide of Sikhs in the Golden Temple in June 1984 and in November 1984 in the whole India . Now he wants to get the sympathy of Hindu voters and tell absolutely rubbish about the killing of 35000 Hindus during the period of 1980′s by the Sikh militants Because the Hindu voters are his only hope to be elected. But it won’t happend Because he is neither clean nor he is smart. Indira Gandi was rewarded her punishment to attack on the Golden Temple called Darbar Sahib, the Holiest Shrine of Sikh Faith on 31 October 1984 and just because of killing one murderer, in the whole India more than 37000 innocent Sikh men ,women , children and elderly were brutally murdered by throwing kerosene on their bodies and putting TYRE around their neck and this Genocide of Sikhs was going on for four long days.The whole India saw it and the world knew it also up to a certain level But no case was registered, no arrest was made , no investigation took place,no case was submitted in the court and one was convicted Because of 37000 innocent Sikh lives and Captain Amrinder expects that everyone shall believe him that 35000Hindus were killed and there was no reaction in the Ruling Hindu majority . Hindu mindset Ruling Elite was not able to register a single case of hindu murder out of so called 35000 killings of Hindus in Punjab ? Who is going to believe Captain Amrinder and his shameless fiction ? Only Fools and Donkeys . The figure of Sikh Genocide is taken from the total number of people , who were given the compensation by the Indian Government . This figure is not complete yet Because a big number of people had left India and many of the victoms families were move to the other parts of India and they never claimed any compensation. There are many who were not given the chance to report the loss of their love ones.

Captain Amrinder and people like him are just charecterless, collaboraters, shameless, conciousless, greedy dogs, a real piece of Shit and son of a Bitch who deserve no Mercy of any kind and should be given the maximum possible punishment of their crimes against the Humanity by themselves and to help other murderers of innocent Sikh population .

The readers should not forget that Capt. Amrinder Singh is sion of Patiala state of Punjab, he is the king but his greed to be the Chief Minister of Punjab has placed him in line of beggers who eye on Sonia Gandhi to give the alms to rule. He is born king but circumstances have made him beggar and enemy of his own community. He also walks on footsteps of those traitors who once uprooted Sikh empire by treachery with Sikh forces in 1849.
Ajmer Singh Randhawa.

ਸੁਨਿ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਬੋਲੇ ਤਿਸ ਬੇਰੇ। ਹਮ ਲੇ ਜਾਨੋ ਪੰਥ ਉਚੇਰੇ…’।

April 16, 2014

Image

 

 

ਸੁਨਿ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਬੋਲੇ ਤਿਸ ਬੇਰੇ। ਹਮ ਲੇ ਜਾਨੋ ਪੰਥ ਉਚੇਰੇ…’।
ਸਾਹਿਬ-ਏ-ਕਮਾਲ 

ਸਾਹਿਬ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦਾ ਜੋ ਚਿੱਤਰ ਹਰ ਸਿੱਖ ਸ਼ਰਧਾਲੂ ਦੇ ਹਿਰਦੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਉਕਰਿਆ ਹੋਇਆ ਹੈ ਉਹ ਬੜਾ ਤੇਜੱਸਵੀ, ਖੋਜ ਭਰਪੂਰ ਤੇ ਜਲਾਲੀ ਹੈ ਜਿਸ ਦਾ ਚਿੰਨ੍ਹ ਸਰੂਪ ਨੀਲੇ ਘੋੜੇ ਦੇ ਸ਼ਾਹ ਅਸਵਾਰ, ਚਿੱਟੇ ਬਾਜ਼ ਵਾਲਾ, ਕਲਗੀਆਂ ਵਾਲਾ ਕਿਲ੍ਹੇ ਤੇ ਫ਼ੌਜਾਂ ਵਾਲਾ ਸੂਰਮਾ ਸਰੂਪ ਹੈ। ਇਸੇ ਲਈ ਸੰਗਤਾਂ ਮਿਲ ਕੇ ਪੜ੍ਹਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ- ਆਉ! ਚਲੋ, ਚੱਲ ਦਰਸ਼ਨ ਕਰੀਏ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਆਏ ਨੇ। ਨੀਲਾ ਘੋੜਾ ਬਾਂਕਾ ਜੋੜਾ ਹੱਥ ਵਿੱਚ ਬਾਜ਼ ਸੁਹਾਏ ਨੇ। ਗੁਰੂ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਦੇ ਏਸ ਸ਼ਸਤਰਧਾਰੀ ਸੂਰਬੀਰ ਰਣਤੱਤੇ ਦੇ ਯੋਧੇ ਜਰਨੈਲ ਦੇ ਬਾਹਰੀ ਸਰੂਪ ਤੋਂ ਜਾਦੂ ਨਾਥ ਸਰਕਾਰ, ਇੰਦੂ ਭੂਸ਼ਨ ਬੈਨਰਜੀ, ਗੋਕਲ ਚੰਦ ਨਾਰੰਗ ਆਦਿ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਇਤਿਹਾਸਕਾਰਾਂ ਨੇ ਭੁਲੇਖੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਲਿਖ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਕਿ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਨੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਵਲੋਂ ਚਲਾਏ ਧਰਮ ਦੀ ਨਿਰਮਲ ਧਾਰਾ ਨੂੰ ਫ਼ੌਜੀ ਛਾਉਣੀ ਦੇ ਮਾਰੂਥਲ ਵਿੱਚ ਤਬਦੀਲ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤਾ। ਵੀਹਵੀਂ ਸਦੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਆਧੁਨਿਕ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਲਿਖਾਰੀਆਂ ਤੇ ਲੀਡਰਾਂ ਨੇ ਵੀ ਇਸੇ ਭਰਮ-ਭੁਲੇਖੇ ਅਧੀਨ ਜਾਂ ਸ਼ਾਇਦ ਜਾਣ-ਬੁੱਝ ਕੇ ਸ਼ਰਾਰਤ ਨਾਲ ਕਿਸੇ ਸਾਜਿਸ਼ੀ ਸੋਚ ਅਧੀਨ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਤੁਲਨਾ ਮੁਗ਼ਲ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਨਾਲ ਲੜਨ ਵਾਲੇ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਰਾਜਿਆਂ ਤੇ ਜਰਨੈਲਾਂ ਮਹਾਰਾਣਾ ਪ੍ਰਤਾਪ ਅਤੇ ਸ਼ਿਵਾ ਜੀ ਮਰਹੱਟਾ ਨਾਲ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ ਜਿਵੇਂ, ਅੱਜ ਦੇ ਵਿਰਾਟ ਹਿੰਦੂਤਵ ਦੇ ਧਾਰਨੀ ਲੀਡਰ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਦੇਵ ਜੀ ਨੂੰ ਮੱਧ ਕਾਲੀਨ ਲਹਿਰ ਦਾ ਇੱਕ ਭਗਤ ਸੰਤ ਦਰਸਾ ਕੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਅਤੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਪੈਗੰਬਰੀ ਹੈਸੀਅਤ ਅਤੇ ਪਦ-ਪੱਦਵੀ ਨਜ਼ਰ ਅੰਦਾਜ਼ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਅਤੇ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਪੰਥ ਨੂੰ ਉਸ ਸਮੇਂ ਦੀ ਤਤਕਾਲੀ ਲੋੜ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਮੁਗ਼ਲਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਰਾਖੀ ਲਈ ਫ਼ੌਜੀ ਲੜਾਕੂ ਦਸਤਾ ਬਿਆਨਦੇ ਹਨ ਜਿਸ ਦਾ ਸਹਿਜੇ ਹੀ ਇਹ ਅਰਥ ਨਿਕਲ ਆਉਂਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ‘ਹੁਣ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਹਿੰਦੂ ਅਤੇ ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨ ਵਿਦੇਸ਼ੀ ਹਮਲਿਆਂ ਤੇ ਗੁਲਾਮੀ ਤੋਂ ਮੁਕਤ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਰਾਜਭਾਗ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤ ਹੈ ਇਸ ਦੇਸ਼ ਦੀ ਐਡੀ ਭਾਰੀ ਸ਼ਕਤੀ ਦੇ ਹੁੰਦਿਆਂ ਅਜੇਹੇ ਲੜਾਕੂ ਫ਼ੌਜੀ ਦਸਤਿਆਂ ਦੀ ਲੋੜ ਨਹੀਂ’!
ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਦੀ ਰਬਾਬ ਵਿਚੋਂ ਨਿਕਲੇ ਅਗੰਮੀ ਸ਼ਬਦ ਦੇ ਤੀਰ ‘ਕਬੀਰ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਸੂਰਮੇ ਬਾਹਿਆ ਬਾਨੁ ਜੁ ਏਕੁ॥ ਲਾਗਤ ਹੀ ਭੁਇ ਗਿਰਿ ਪਰਿਆ ਪਰਾ ਕਰੇਜੇ ਛੇਕੁ॥’ ਨੇ ਮੋਹ ਮਾਇਆ ਭਰਮ ਭੁਲੇਖੇ ਅਤੇ ਸਮੇਂ ਦੇ ਰਾਜ ਤੋਂ ਭੈਅ-ਭੀਤ ਲੁਕਾਈ ਨੂੰ ਹਲੂਣ ਕੇ ਜਗਾਉਣ ਦਾ ਜੋ ਕਾਰਜ ਆਰੰਭਿਆ, ਉਸੇ ਹੀ ਕਾਰਜ ਪੂਰਤੀ ਲਈ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਖੰਡੇ ਅਤੇ ਖੜਗ ਦਾ ਪ੍ਰਯੋਗ ਕੀਤਾ। ਜੇਕਰ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਦੇਵ ਜੀ ਦੀ ਰਬਾਬ ਤੂਹੀ ਤੂਹੀ ਦੀ ਧੁਨੀ ਅਲਾਪਦੀ ਸੀ, ਸਤਿਕਰਤਾਰ ਬੰਦਾ ਨਾਨਕ ਤੇਰਾ ਦੀ ਜੈਕਾਰ ਕਰਦੀ ਸੀ ਤਾਂ ਉਥੇ ਖੜਗਧਾਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਦਸਮੇਸ਼ ਜੀ ਇਕੋ ਚੌਂਕੜੇ ਵਿੱਚ 16,000 ਵੇਰ ਤੂੰ ਹੀ ਤੂੰ ਹੀ ਦਾ ਅਲਾਪ ਕੀਤਾ ਅਤੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਆਪ ਨੂੰ ਪਰਮ ਪੁਰਖ ਦਾ ਦਾਸ ‘ਮੈ ਹੋ ਪਰਮ ਪੁਰਖ ਕੋ ਦਾਸਾ’ ਦੱਸ ਇਕੋ ਇੱਕ ਮਨੋਰਥ ‘ਧਰਮ ਚਲਾਵਨ ਸੰਤ ਉਬਾਰਨ॥ ਦੁਸਟ ਸਭਨ ਕੋ ਮੂਲ ਉਪਾਰਨਿ’। ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਖੜਗਧਾਰੀ ਅਤੇ ਦੋ-ਧਾਰੇ ਖੰਡੇ ਦੀ ਬਿਜਲਈ ਚਮਕ ਨਾਲ ਅੱਖਾਂ ਚੁੰਧਿਆ ਜਾਂਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ। ਇਸੇ ਲਈ ਵਿਦਵਾਨ ਇਤਿਹਾਸਕਾਰਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਇਹ ਨੂਰਾਨੀ, ਅਗੰਮੀ, ਅਧਿਆਤਮਕ ਸਰੂਪ ਨਹੀਂ ਦਿੱਸ ਆਉਂਦਾ। ਗੁਰੂ ਸਾਹਿਬਾਨ ਅਤੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਸਿਧਾਂਤਾਂ ਦੀ ਪਰਖ ਉਸੇ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਮਾਪਦੰਡ ਨਾਲ ਹੀ ਹੋ ਸਕਦੀ ਹੈ, ਜਿਵੇਂ ਲੋਹੇ ਅਤੇ ਸੋਨੇ ਨੂੰ ਪਰਖਣ ਲਈ, ਖਾਧ ਪਦਾਰਥ ਅਤੇ ਫੁੱਲਾਂ ਦੀ ਖੁਸ਼ਬੋਅ ਨੂੰ ਪਰਖਣ ਲਈ, ਪੈਮਾਨੇ ਇਕਸਾਰ ਨਹੀਂ ਅਲੱਗ-ਅਲੱਗ ਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਨ ਏਸੇ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਹਰ ਗੁਰੂ, ਅਵਤਾਰ, ਪੈਗੰਬਰ ਅਤੇ ਹਰ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਸਿਧਾਂਤਾਂ ਤੇ ਚੱਕਰ ਚਿਹਨ ਨੂੰ ਪਰਖਣ ਲਈ ਮਾਪਦੰਡ ਆਪੋ ਆਪਣੇ ਹਨ ਅਤੇ ਜੇਕਰ ਕੋਈ ਆਪਣੇ ਫਲਸਫ਼ੇ ਤੇ ਮਾਪਦੰਡ ਨਾਲ ਕਿਸੇ ਹੋਰ ਦਾ ਧਰਮ ਪਰਖਣਾ ਚਾਹੇ ਤਾਂ ਉਸ ਦਾ ਨਤੀਜਾ ਓਝੜ ਪੈਣਾ ਅਤੇ ਗੁੰਮਰਾਹਕੁੰਨ ਹੀ ਹੋਵੇਗਾ। ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਸਿਧਾਂਤਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਅਪਣੇ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਪੈਮਾਨੇ ਨਾਲ ਪਰਖਣ ਕਾਰਨ ਹੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਦੀ ਰਬਾਬ ਅਤੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਦੇ ਜਲਾਲ ਵਿੱਚ ਫਰਕ ਨਜ਼ਰ ਆਉਂਦਾ ਹੈ।
ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਸੂਰਮਾ ਜਾਂ ਬਹਾਦਰ ਉਸ ਨੂੰ ਤਸੱਵਰ ਕਰਦੀ ਹੈ ਜਿਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਸਰੀਰਕ, ਰਾਜਸੀ ਅਤੇ ਫ਼ੌਜੀ ਬੱਲ ਹੋਵੇ ਪਰ ਸਿੱਖੀ ਦੀ ਨਿਰਾਲੀ ਚਾਲ ਦੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਅਮਰਦਾਸ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਅਨੰਦ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੀ ਵਿਆਖਿਆ ਇੰਝ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੈ, ‘ਭਗਤਾ ਕੀ ਚਾਲ ਨਿਰਾਲੀ॥ ਚਾਲਾ ਨਿਰਾਲੀ ਭਗਤਾਹ ਕੇਰੀ ਬਿਖਮ ਮਾਰਗਿ ਚਲਣਾ॥ ਲਬੁ ਲੋਭੁ ਅਹੰਕਾਰੁ ਤਜਿ ਤ੍ਰਿਸਨਾ ਬਹੁਤੁ ਨਾਹੀ ਬੋਲਣਾ॥ ਏਸੇ ਲਈ ਸਿੱਖੀ ਨੂੰ ‘ਖੰਨਿਅਹੁ ਤਿਖੀ ਵਾਲਹੁ ਨਿਕੀ ਏਤੁ ਮਾਰਗਿ ਜਾਣਾ॥ ਬਾਬਾ ਫਰੀਦ ਜੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਸਮੇਂ ਕਾਲ ਕਰਕੇ ਪਹਿਲੇ ਸ਼ਬਦ ਉਚਾਰਨ ਵਾਲੇ ਹਨ ਜੋ ਗੁਰੂ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਤੋਂ ਵੀ ਪਹਿਲਾਂ ਏਸ ਮਾਰਗ ਸਬੰਧੀ ਇਉਂ ਅੰਕਿਤ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ ‘ਵਾਟ ਹਮਾਰੀ ਖਰੀ ਉਡੀਣੀ ॥ ਖੰਨਿਅਹੁ ਤਿਖੀ ਬਹੁਤੁ ਪਿਈਣੀ॥ ਉਸੁ ਊਪਰਿ ਹੈ ਮਾਰਗੁ ਮੇਰਾ॥ ਸੇਖ ਫਰੀਦਾ ਪੰਥੁ ਸਮ੍‍ਾਰਿ ਸਵੇਰਾ॥’ ਗੁਰਬਾਣੀ ਨੇ ਸੂਰਮੇਂ ਦੀ ਵਿਆਖਿਆ ਹੀ ਇਉਂ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੈ ‘ਜਾ ਕਉ ਹਰਿ ਰੰਗੁ ਲਾਗੋ ਇਸੁ ਜੁਗ ਮਹਿ ਸੋ ਕਹੀਅਤ ਹੈ ਸੂਰਾ॥’ ਏਸੇ ਲਈ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਸਿੱਖੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਪ੍ਰਵੇਸ਼ ਦੀ ਪਹਿਲੀ ਸ਼ਰਤ ਹੀ ਇਹ ਲਗਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ, ‘ਜਉ ਤਉ ਪ੍ਰੇਮ ਖੇਲਣ ਕਾ ਚਾਉ॥ ਸਿਰੁ ਧਰਿ ਤਲੀ ਗਲੀ ਮੇਰੀ ਆਉ॥ ਗੁਰੂ ਰਾਮਦਾਸ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਸ਼ਬਦਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਇਹ ‘ਤਨੁ ਮਨੁ ਕਾਟਿ ਕਾਟਿ ਸਭੁ ਅਰਪੀ’ ਦਾ ਮਾਰਗ ਹੈ ਗੁਰੂ ਅਰਜਨ ਦੇਵ ਜੀ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ‘ਪਹਿਲਾ ਮਰਣੁ ਕਬੂਲਿ ਜੀਵਣ ਕੀ ਛਡਿ ਆਸ’ ਕਰਕੇ ਬਿਆਨਦੇ ਹਨ। ਗੁਰੂ ਤੇਗ਼ ਬਹਾਦਰ ਪਾਤਿਸ਼ਾਹ ਡਰ ਭੈਅ ਰਹਿਤ, ਨਿਡਰ ਤੇ ਗਿਆਨਵਾਨ ਨੂੰ ਗਿਆਨੀ ਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ ‘ਭੈ ਕਾਹੂ ਕਉ ਦੇਤ ਨਹਿ ਨਹਿ ਭੈ ਮਾਨਤ ਆਨ॥ ਕਹੁ ਨਾਨਕ ਸੁਨਿ ਰੇ ਮਨਾ ਗਿਆਨੀ ਤਾਹਿ ਬਖਾਨਿ॥’ ਇਸ ਦਾ ਅਰਥ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਨੇ ਆਰੰਭ ਤੋਂ ਹੀ ਸੰਸਾਰ ਤਜ ਜੰਗਲਾਂ, ਪਹਾੜਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਰੇਗਿਸਤਾਨਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਤਪ ਕਰਕੇ ਨਿੱਜੀ ਮੁਕਤੀ ਦੇ ਪ੍ਰਚੱਲਤ ਧਰਮ ਸਿਧਾਂਤ ਨੂੰ ਮੁੱਢੋਂ ਹੀ ਖਾਰਜ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ ਉਹ ਅਧਿਆਤਮਿਕਤਾ ਦਾ ਧਰਮ ਸਵੀਕਾਰ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰਦੇ ਬਲਕਿ ਉਹ ਐਸੇ ਗੁਰਮੁਖਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਖੋਜ ਕੇ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੀਆਂ ਸੰਗਤਾਂ ਕਾਇਮ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ ਜਿਹੜੇ ਮਜ਼੍ਹਬਾਂ, ਅਡੰਬਰਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਸਖ਼ਸ਼ੀ ਮਨੋਰਥਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਉਚੇਰੇ ਹੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਬਲਕਿ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਦੁੱਖ ਅਤੇ ਪੀੜਾ ਨੂੰ ਦੂਰ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਆਪਣੇ ਪ੍ਰਾਣਾਂ ਦੀ ਬਾਜੀ ਵੀ ਲਾ ਸਕਦੇ ਹਨ। ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਐਸੇ ਹੀ ਸੰਤ-ਸਿਪਾਹੀ ਹਨ ਜੋ ਪ੍ਰਮਾਤਮਾ ਨੂੰ ਬਣਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਖੋਜਣ ਨਹੀਂ ਜਾਂਦੇ ‘ਕਾਹੇ ਰੇ ਬਨ ਖੋਜਨ ਜਾਈ’ ਬਲਕਿ ‘ਗਿਆਨਹਿ ਕੀ ਬਢਨੀ (ਬਹੁਕਰ,ਹਥਿਆਰ) ਮਨਹੁ ਹਾਥ ਲੈ ਕਾਤਰਤਾ ਕੁਤਵਾਰ ਬੁਹਾਰੈ’ ਕਾਇਰਤਾ ਨੂੰ ਕੁਤਰਾ-ਕੁਤਰਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਧਰਮ ਦੇ ਬੰਧਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਦੁਨਿਆਵੀ ਤਾਕਤਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਨਿਡਰ ਸੰਤ-ਸਿਪਾਹੀ ਬਣਾ ਦੇਂਦੇ ਹਨ। ਇਹ ਆਦਰਸ਼ਕ ਮਨੁੱਖ ਜਾਗਤ-ਜੋਤਿ ਦੇ ਜਾਪ ਨਾਲ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ਮਾਨ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ‘ਸੰਤਾ ਮਾਨਉ ਦੂਤਾ ਡਾਨਉ ਇਹ ਕੁਟਵਾਰੀ ਮੇਰੀ’ ਦੇ ਰੱਬੀ-ਕਾਰਜ ਲਈ ਤੱਤਪਰ ਰਹਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ ਐਸੇ ਪੁਰਖ ਨੂੰ ਹੀ ਧੰਨਤਾ ਦੇ ਯੋਗ ਮੰਨਿਆ ਹੈ, ‘ਧੰਨ ਜੀਓ ਤਿਹ ਕੋ ਜਗ ਮੈ ਮੁਖ ਤੇ ਹਰਿ ਚਿੱਤ ਮੈ ਜੁੱਧ ਬਿਚਾਰੈ’ ਗੁਰੂ ਦਸ਼ਮੇਸ਼ ਨੇ ਸ਼ਸਤਰ ਧਾਰਨ ਕਰਕੇ ਸ਼ਸਤਰਾਂ ਦੀ ਵਰਤੋਂ ਹੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤੀ ਬਲਕਿ ਸ਼ਸਤਰਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਮਾਣਿਆਂ ਹੈ ‘ਨਮੋ ਸ਼ਸਤ੍ਰ ਪਾਣੇ’ ਪਰ ਇਹ ਦੁਨਿਆਵੀ ਜੰਗਾਂ ਨਾਲੋਂ ਵਖਰੇ ਹਨ।
ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਜੰਗਾਂ ਤੇ ਯੁੱਧ ਜ਼ਰ, ਜ਼ੋਰੂ ਅਤੇ ਜ਼ਮੀਨ ਅਰਥਾਤ ਧਨ, ਜਾਇਦਾਦ, ਇਸਤਰੀ ਅਤੇ ਧਰਤੀ ਤੇ ਰਾਜ ਕਾਇਮ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਕਬਜ਼ਾ ਕਰਨ ਕਰਕੇ ਹੀ ਹੋਈਆਂ ਹਨ ਪਰ ਮਰਦ ਅਗੰਮੜੇ ਨੇ ਚੌਦਾਂ ਜੰਗਾਂ ਲੜੀਆਂ ਕਿਸੇ ਤੇ ਹਮਲਾ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤਾ ਬਲਕਿ ਆਪਣੇ ਤੇ ਹੋਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਹਰ ਹਮਲੇ ਦੇ ਮੁਕਾਬਲੇ ਲਈ ਯੁੱਧ ਕੀਤਾ ਅਤੇ ਚੌਦਾਂ ਜੰਗਾਂ ਲੜਨ ਉਪ੍ਰੰਤ ਵੀ ਇੱਕ ਇੰਚ ਭਰ ਵੀ ਕਿਸੇ ਦੀ ਜ਼ਮੀਨ ਤੇ ਕਬਜ਼ਾ ਕਰ ਦੁਨਿਆਵੀ ਬਾਦਸ਼ਾਹਤ ਕਾਇਮ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤੀ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੀ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ ਦੇ ਚਰਨਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਐਸੀ ਪ੍ਰੀਤ, ਲਿਵ ਜੁੜੀ ਕਿ ਉਹ ਯੁੱਧ ਗਰੀਬ (ਦੀਨ) ਮਜ਼ਲੂਮਾਂ ਦੀ ਰੱਖਿਆ ਲਈ ਅਤੇ ਜ਼ਾਲਮ ਜਰਵਾਣੇ ਦੀ ਭੱਛਿਆ ਲਈ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ ਪਰ ਮੰਤਵ ਇਹੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਜਾਲਮ-ਜ਼ੁਲਮ ਦਾ ਰਾਹ ਛੱਡ ਦੇਵੇ ਅਤੇ ਰਾਜ ਨੂੰ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਦੇ ਹਿੱਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਚਲਾਵੇ। ਏਸੇ ਲਈ ਉਹ ਐਸੇ ਯੁੱਧਾਂ ਨੂੰ ‘ਨਮੋ ਜੁੱਧ ਜੁੱਧੇ’ ਉਚਾਰ ਕੇ ਸਿੱਜਦਾ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਦੁਨਿਆਵੀ ਜੰਗਾਂ ਬਾਰੇ ਮਨੌਤ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਮੁਹੱਬਤ ਤੇ ਜੰਗ ਵਿੱਚ ਸਭ ਜਾਇਜ਼ ਹੈ (ਓਵੲਰੇ ਠਹਨਿਗ ਸਿ ਢੳਰਿ ਨਿ ਲ਼ੋਵੲ ਫ਼ ਾਂੳਰ) ਪਰ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਉਸ ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਦੇ ਉਪਜੇ ਮਨੁੱਖ ਦੇ ਪਿਆਰ ਅਤੇ ਧਰਮ ਤੇ ਇਖ਼ਲਾਕ ਦੀਆਂ ਉੱਚ ਕਦਰਾਂ-ਕੀਮਤਾਂ ਬਰਕਰਾਰ ਰੱਖਦੇ ਹੋਏ ਯੁੱਧ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਜੰਗਾਂ ਜਿੱਤਣ ਉਪ੍ਰੰਤ ਉਹ ਦੁਸ਼ਮਣ ਦੀ ਨਾਰੀ, ਇਸਤਰੀ ਨਾਲ ਵੀ ਇਖ਼ਲਾਕ ਦੀ ਸੀਮਾਂ ਟੱਪਣ ਦੀ ਆਗਿਆ ਨਹੀਂ ਦੇਂਦੇ। ਹੁਸ਼ਿਆਰਪੁਰ ਦੇ ਰੰਘੜਾਂ ਵਲੋਂ ਸਿੱਖ ਜਥੇ ਨੂੰ ਲੁੱਟਣ ਦਾ ਅਪ੍ਰਾਧ ਕਰਨ ਤੇ ਦੰਡਿਤ ਕਰਕੇ ਜਿਥੇ ਆਪਣੀਆਂ ਸਿੰਘਣੀਆਂ ਤੇ ਮਾਲ ਅਸਬਾਬ ਵਾਪਿਸ ਲਿਆਂਦਾ ਉਥੇ ਰੰਘੜਾਂ ਦੀਆਂ ਬੇਗਮਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਮਾਲ ਅਸਬਾਬ ਵੀ ਲੈ ਆਉਣ ਦਾ ਪਤਾ ਲੱਗਣ ਤੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਨੇ ਉਸੇ ਵੇਲੇ ਸਿੰਘਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਤਾੜਨਾ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਹੁਕਮ ਕੀਤਾ ਕਿ ਹੁਣੇ ਇਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਬਾ-ਇੱਜ਼ਤ ਇਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਘਰੀਂ ਪਹੁੰਚਾ ਕੇ ਆਉ, ਇਸ ਸਬੰਧੀ ਬੜਾ ਰੌਚਕ ਸੰਬਾਦ ਹੈ ‘ਪੁਨਿ ਸਿੰਘਨ ਬੂਝੇ ਗੁਨ ਖਾਨੀ’ ਅਰਥਾਤ ਗੁਣਾਂ ਦੀ ਖਾਨ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਨੂੰ ਸਿੱਖ ਸਮੂਹ ਰੂਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਪੁੱਛਦੇ ਹਨ ‘ਸਗਲ ਤੁਰਕ ਭੁਗਵੈ ਹਿੰਦੁਵਾਨੀ’ ਕਹਿ ਕੇ ਤਤਕਾਲੀ ਹੋ ਰਹੀ ਸ਼ਰਮ ਧਰਮ ਦੀ ਦੁਰਦਸ਼ਾ ਬਿਆਨ ਕਰਦੇ ਹੋਏ ਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਕਿ ਉਹ ਮਜਲੂਮ ਹਿੰਦੂਆਂ ਦੀਆਂ ਇਸਤਰੀਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਜਬਰੀ ਚੁੱਕ ਕੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਘਰਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਰੱਖ ਲੈਦੇ ਹਨ ਪਰ ਜਦ ‘ਸਿੱਖ ਬਦਲਾ ਲੇ ਭਲਾ ਜਨਾਵੈਂ। ਗੁਰ ਸਾਸ਼ਤ੍ਰ ਕ੍ਯੋਂ ਵਰਜ ਹਟਾਵੈਂ’ ਸਿੱਖ ਐਸੇ ਜ਼ਾਲਮ ਹੁਕਮਰਾਨਾਂ ਤੋ ਬਦਲਾ ਲੈਣਾ ਚਾਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਨ ਤਾਂ ਗੁਰੂ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਧਰਮ ਤੇ ਇਖ਼ਲਾਕ ਦੀ ਗੱਲ ਕਹਿ ਕੇ ਸਾਨੂੰ ਕਿਉਂ ਵਰਜਦੇ ਹਨ? ਗੁਰੂ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਨੇ ਜੋ ਉੱਤਰ ਦਿੱਤਾ, ਉਸ ਦਾ ਅੱਜ ਤੱਕ ਹੋਰ ਕਿਸੇ ਤੋਂ ਵੀ ਪਾਲਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆ ‘ਸੁਨਿ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਬੋਲੇ ਤਿਸ ਬੇਰੇ। ਹਮ ਲੇ ਜਾਨੋ ਪੰਥ ਉਚੇਰੇ…’।

ਦਸਮ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਨੇ ਮਨੁੱਖ ਲਈ ਧਰਮ ਇਖ਼ਲਾਕ ਦੀਆਂ ਉੱਚੀਆਂ-ਸੁੱਚੀਆਂ ਕਦਰਾਂ ਕੀਮਤਾਂ ਸਥਾਪਤ ਕੀਤੀਆਂ। ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਕਿਸੇ ਨਿੱਜੀ ਲਾਲਸਾ, ਸਵਾਰਥ ਲਈ ਜੰਗ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰ ਰਹੇ ਬਲਕਿ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਦੀ ਜੰਗ ਵੀ ਦੁਸ਼ਟ ਜਾਲਮਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਤਾੜਨਾ ਕਰਨ ਵਾਲੀ ਅਤੇ ਹੱਕ ਤੇ ਸੱਚ ਉੱਤੇ ਚੱਲਣ ਦਾ ਸਬਕ ਸਿਖਾਉਣ ਲਈ ਹੈ। ਏਸੇ ਲਈ ਤਾਂ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦੇ ਹਰ ਤੀਰ ਤੇ ਸਵਾ-ਤੋਲਾ ਸੋਨਾ ਲੱਗਿਆ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਸੀ ਤਾਂ ਜੋ ਮਰਨ ਵਾਲੇ ਦਾ ਉਸ ਸੋਨੇ ਨਾਲ ਅੰਤਿਮ ਕ੍ਰਿਆ ਕ੍ਰਮ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਾ ਸਕੇ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਗਿਆਨਤਾ ਨੂੰ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤ ਇਕ ਸਿੱਖ, ਭਾਈ ਘਨੱਈਆ ਸਿੱਖਾਂ ਤੇ ਦੁਸ਼ਮਣਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਦੀ ਇਕ ਜੋਤ ਦੇਖ ਮਿੱਤਰ ਅਤੇ ਦੁਸ਼ਮਣ ਨੂੰ ਇਕ ਸਮਾਨ ਜਾਣ, ਜਲ ਛਕਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ। ਜਦ ਸਿੱਖਾਂ ਨੇ ਸ਼ਿਕਾਇਤ ਕੀਤੀ ਤਾਂ ਭਾਈ ਘਨੱਈਆ ਜੀ ਦਾ ਉੱਤਰ ਸੀ ਕਿ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਤਾਂ ਜੰਗ ਵਿੱਚ ਕੋਈ ਮਿੱਤਰ ਜਾਂ ਦੁਸ਼ਮਣ ਨਹੀਂ ਬਲਕਿ ਆਪ ਹੀ ਨਜ਼ਰ ਆਉਂਦੇ ਹੋ, ਤਾਂ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਨੇ ਮਰਹੱਮ ਪੱਟੀ ਦੇ ਕੇ ਕਿਹਾ ਕਿ ਹੁਣ ਤੁਸੀਂ ਜਲ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਨਾਲ ਮਰਹੱਮ ਪੱਟੀ ਵੀ ਕਰਨੀ ਹੈ। ਰੈੱਡ-ਕਰਾਸ ਤਾਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਵਿੱਚ ਬਣਿਆ ਪਰ ਉਹ ਵੀ ਐਸਾ ਆਚਰਣ ਪੈਦਾ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਰ ਸਕਿਆ ਕਿ ਲੜਨ ਵਾਲੀ ਇਕ ਧਿਰ ਵਿਚੋਂ ਹੁੰਦਾ ਹੋਇਆ ਉਹ ਜੰਗ ਦੇ ਮੈਦਾਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਆਪਣਿਆਂ ਤੇ ਦੁਸ਼ਮਣਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਸਮ ਕਰਕੇ ਜਾਣੇ। ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦੇ ਸਾਰੇ ਯੁੱਧ ਜਿੱਤ ਹਾਸਲ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਨ ਅਤੇ ਜਿੱਤ ਦਾ ਸਿਹਰਾ ਜਰਨੈਲ ਦੇ ਸਿਰ ’ਤੇ ਬੱਝਦਾ ਹੈ ਪਰ ਗੁਰੂ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਪਾਉਂਟਾ ਸਹਿਬ ਦੀ ਜੰਗ ਜਿੱਤਣ ਉਪਰੰਤ ਇਸ ਜਿੱਤ ਨੂੰ ‘ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫ਼ਤਹ’ ਦਸਦੇ ਹਨ। ‘ਭਈ ਜੀਤ ਮੇਰੀ ਕ੍ਰਿਪਾ ਕਾਲ ਕੇਰੀ’ ਉਪਰੰਤ ਜਦੋਂ ਖ਼ਾਲਸੇ ਦੀ ਸਿਰਜਣਾ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਤਾਂ ਫਿਰ ਹਰ ਜਿੱਤ ਦਾ ਸਿਹਰਾ ਆਪਣੇ ਖ਼ਾਲਸੇ ਨੂੰ ਦਿੱਤਾ ‘ਜੁੱਧ ਜਿਤੇ ਇਨਹੀ ਕੇ ਪ੍ਰਸਾਦਿ’।
ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਦੀਆਂ ਹੁਣ ਤੀਕ ਹੋਈਆਂ ਜੰਗਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਜਦੋਂ ਇਕ ਧਿਰ ਦੂਜੀ ਧਿਰ ਨੂੰ ਆਪਣੇ ’ਤੇ ਭਾਰੂ ਤੇ ਸ਼ਕਤੀਸ਼ਾਲੀ ਦਿੱਸਦੀ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ ਹਥਿਆਰ ਸੁੱਟ ਕੇ ਅਧੀਨਗੀ ਕਬੂਲ ਕਰ ਲਂੈਦੀ ਹੈ। ਅਜੇ ਪਿੱਛੇ ਜਿਹੇ ਹੋਏ 1971 ਭਾਰਤ-ਪਾਕਿ ਜੰਗ ਵਿੱਚ ਭਾਰਤੀ ਫ਼ੌਜ ਜਦੋਂ ਜਗਜੀਤ ਸਿੰਘ ਦੀ ਅਗਵਾਈ ਵਿੱਚ ਢਾਕੇ ਪੁੱਜ ਗਈ ਤਾਂ 93000 ਫ਼ੌਜਾਂ ਸਮੇਤ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਦੇ ਜਰਨੈਲ ਨਿਆਜ਼ੀ ਨੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਹਥਿਆਰ ਸੁੱਟ ਸਰੰਡਰ ਕੀਤਾ ਅਤੇ ਭਾਰਤੀ ਫ਼ੌਜ ਦੀ ਕੈਦ ਵਿੱਚ ਚਲੇ ਗਏ। ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਸਭ ਤੋਂ ਵੱਡਾ ਜੰਗਜੂ ਵਿਜੇਤਾ ਨੈਪੋਲੀਅਨ ਨੂੰ ਮੰਨਦੀ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਹਰ ਜੰਗ ਜਿੱਤਣ ਉਪਰੰਤ ਕਹਿਣ ਲੱਗ ਪਿਆ ਸੀ ‘ਮੈਂ ਆਇਆ, ਮੈਂ ਦੇਖਿਆ ਤੇ ਜੰਗ ਜਿੱਤ ਲਈ (Every Thing is Fair in Love & War) ਪਰ ਜਦੋਂ ਉਸ ਵਿਜੇਤਾ ਅਖਵਾਉਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਨੇ ਆਖਰੀ ਲੜਾਈ ਵਿੱਚ ਹਾਰ ਮੰਨੀ ਤਾਂ ਉਸ ਕੋਲ ਬੜੀ ਵੱਡੀ ਤਾਦਾਦ ਵਿੱਚ ਹਥਿਆਰ ਬੰਦ ਫ਼ੌਜ ਵੀ ਸੀ ਅਤੇ ਉਹ ਜੰਗ ਵੀ ਪੱਕੇ ਕਿਲ੍ਹੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਲੜ ਰਿਹਾ ਸੀ ਪਰ ਅਸ਼ਕੇ ਜਾਈਏ ਮਰਦ ਅਗੰਮੜੇ ਦੇ ਜੋ ਚਮਕੌਰ ਦੀ ਗੜ੍ਹੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਚਾਲੀ ਭੁੱਖੇ ਤਿਹਾਏ ਸਿੱਖਾਂ ਨਾਲ ਕੱਚੀ ਗੜ੍ਹੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹਜ਼ਾਰਾਂ-ਲੱਖਾਂ ਦੀ ਫ਼ੌਜ ਵਿੱਚ ਘਿਰਿਆ ਵੀ ਰਣਤਤੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਜੂਝਿਆ ਅਤੇ ਸਿੰਘਾਂ ਨਾਲ ਇੱਕ-ਇੱਕ ਕਰਕੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਦੋ ਪੁਤਰਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਜੰਗ ਲੜਦਿਆਂ, ਸ਼ਹੀਦ ਹੁੰਦਿਆਂ ਤੱਕਿਆ ਪਰ ਹਾਰ ਨਹੀਂ ਮੰਨੀ ਉਲਟਾ ਬੇਸਰੋ ਸਮਾਨੀ ਦੇ ਹਾਲਾਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਕੰਡਿਆਂ ਭਰੇ ਪੈਂਡੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਲਹੂ-ਲੁਹਾਨ ਪੈਰਾਂ ਅਤੇ ਲੀਰੋ-ਲੀਰ ਜਾਮੇਂ ਨਾਲ ਨੀਲੇ ਅਸਮਾਨ ਥੱਲੇ ਉਜਾੜ ਜੰਗਲ ਵਿੱਚ ਵੀ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਭਾਣੇ ਨੂੰ ਭਲਾ ਕਰ ਮੰਨਿਆਂ ਅਤੇ ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਦਾ ਸ਼ੁਕਰਾਨਾ ਕੀਤਾ। ਜਦੋਂ ਮਾਹੀ ਨੇ ਛੋਟੇ ਦੋ ਸਾਹਿਬਜ਼ਾਦਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ ਸਰਹੰਦ ਦੀਆਂ ਨੀਹਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਚਿਣਵਾ ਕੇ ਸ਼ਹੀਦ ਕਰਨ ਦੀ ਦਾਸਤਾਂ ਸੁਣਾਈ ਤਾਂ ਵੀ ਇਸ ਇਲਾਹੀ ਮਾਹੀ ਨੇ ਕਿਹਾ ‘ਸ਼ੁਕਰ ਹੈ ਆਜ ਅਮਾਨਤ ਅਦਾ ਹੁਈ’ ਜਿਸ ਕੀ ਬਸਤੁ ਤਿਸੁ ਆਗੈ ਰਾਖੈ॥ ਪ੍ਰਭ ਕੀ ਆਗਿਆ ਮਾਨੈ ਮਾਥੈ॥ ਦੇ ਸਾਕਾਰ ਪੂਰਨੇ ਪਾਏ। ਉਸ ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਨੂੰ ਆਪਣਾ ਮਿੱਤਰ-ਪਿਆਰਾ ਮੁਖਾਤਬ ਕਰਕੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਪਿੰਡੇ ’ਤੇ ਹੰਢਾਏ ਸਾਰੇ ਜਖ਼ਮਾਂ ਦੀ ਪੀੜਾ ਸਹਿਨ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਹੋਇਆਂ ਆਪਣੀ ਪ੍ਰੀਤ ਪੁਗਾਉਣ ਦੀ ਗੱਲ ਕਹੀ ‘ਮਿਤ੍ਰ ਪਿਆਰੇ ਨੂੰ ਹਾਲ ਮੁਰੀਦਾਂ ਦਾ ਕਹਣਾ’ ਫਿਰ ਮਹਿਲ ਮਾੜੀਆਂ ਨਾਲੋ ‘ਯਾਰੜੇ ਦਾ ਸਾਨੂੰ ਸੱਥਰ ਚੰਗਾ’ ਕਹਿ ਕੇ ਹੁਕਮ ਰਜਾਈ ਚੱਲਣ ਦੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਵਲੋਂ ਜਪੁ ਜੀ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੇ ਆਰੰਭ ਵਿੱਚ ਨਿਸ਼ਚਤ ਕੀਤੇ ਮਾਰਗ ’ਤੇ ਚਲ ਕੇ ਹੁਕਮ ਦੀ ਰਜ਼ਾ ਵਿੱਚ ਚੱਲਣ ਦੇ ਮਾਰਗ ਨੂੰ ਆਉਂਦੀਆਂ ਪੀੜ੍ਹੀਆਂ ਲਈ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ਮਾਨ ਕੀਤਾ।
ਨੀਲੇ ਦੇ ਸ਼ਾਹ ਅਸਵਾਰ ਨੇ ਜਦੋਂ ਪੈਦਲ ਹੀ ਕੰਡਿਆਲੇ ਰਾਹ ਅਖਤਿਆਰ ਕੀਤੇ ਤਾਂ ਜੇ ਕਿਸੇ ਕਿਹਾ, ‘ਨਾ ਡੱਲਾ ਨਾ ਮੱਲਾ, ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਕੱਲਾ’ ਤਾਂ ਚੜ੍ਹਦੀ ਕਲਾ ਦਾ ਉੱਤਰ ਬਖ਼ਸ਼ਿਆ ‘ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਨਾਲ ਅਲਾਹ’ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਭਗਤੀ ਦੇ ਐਸੇ ਦ੍ਰਿੜ੍ਹ ਵਿਸ਼ਵਾਸ ਦਾ ਕੋਈ ਦ੍ਰਿਸ਼ਟੀਮਾਨ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਇਆ। ਜਦੋਂ ਸਰਕਾਰ ਦੇ ਭੇਜੇ ਕਈ ਦੂਤਾਂ ਤੇ ਚੇਲਿਆਂ ਨੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਨੂੰ ਫ਼ੌਜਾਂ ਕਿਲ੍ਹਿਆਂ ਤੇ ਪਰਿਵਾਰ ਤੋਂ ਬਿਨਾਂ ਦੇਖਿਆ ਤਾਂ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਹਕੂਮਤ ਦੀ ਈਨ ਮੰਨ ਕੇ ਸਮਝੌਤਾ ਕਰਨ ਦੀ ਗੱਲ ਕਹੀ ਤਾਂ ਉਸ ਇਲਾਹੀ ਪ੍ਰੀਤਮ ਨੇ ਹਰ ਐਸੀ ਪੇਸ਼ਕਸ਼ ਨੂੰ ਠੁਕਰਾਇਆ ਹੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਉਲਟਾ ਜਿੱਤ ਦਾ ਖ਼ਤ ਅਰਥਾਤ ‘ਜ਼ਫ਼ਰਨਾਮਾ’ ਲਿਖ ਭਾਈ ਦਇਆ ਸਿੰਘ ਰਾਹੀਂ ਔਰੰਗਜ਼ੇਬ ਪਾਸ ਭੇਜਿਆ ਜਦ ਉਹ ਦੱਖਣ ਵਿੱਚ ਬਗ਼ਾਵਤ ਦਬਾਉਣ ਗਿਆ ਸੀ। ਔਰੰਗਜ਼ੇਬ ਨੂੰ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਕੀਤੇ ਜ਼ੁਲਮਾਂ ਦੀ ਤਸਵੀਰ ਦਿਖਾਈ ਅਤੇ ਉਸ ਨੂੰ ਦਿੱਲੀ ਤਖ਼ਤ ਦੇ ਅਯੋਗ ਕਰਾਰ ਦੇ ਕੇ ਚਣੌਤੀ ਵੀ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਕਿ ‘ਕੀ ਹੋਇਆ, ਜੇ ਤੂੰ ਚਾਰ ਪੁੱਤਰ ਸ਼ਹੀਦ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤੇ ਅਜੇ ਤਾਂ ਫਨੀਅਰ ਨਾਗ ਦੇ ਰੂਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਤੇਰੇ ਜ਼ੁਲਮਾਂ ਦੀ ਸਜ਼ਾ ਦੇਣ ਲਈ ਮੈਂ ਮੋਜ਼ੂਦ ਹਾਂ’ ਚੈਲੈਂਜ ਕੀਤਾ ਕਿ ‘ਤੂੰ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਆ ਤੇਰੇ ਘੋੜਿਆਂ ਦੇ ਪੈਰਾਂ ਥੱਲੇ ਬਗਾਵਤ ਦੀ ਐਸੀ ਅੱਗ ਬਾਲ ਦਿਆਂਗਾ ਕਿ ਸਾਰੇ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਵਿੱਚ ਤੇਰੇ ਘੋੜਿਆਂ ਤੇ ਘੋੜ ਸਵਾਰਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਭੱਜਦਿਆਂ ਪਾਣੀ ਨਹੀਂ ਮਿਲੇਗਾ’। ਹਰ ਸੰਕਟ ਤੇ ਮੁਸ਼ਕਿਲ ਵਿੱਚ ਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਆਪ ਹੀ ਅਡਿੱਗ ਅਤੇ ਅਡੋਲ ਨਹੀਂ ਰਹੇ ‘ਮਨੁ ਨ ਡਿਗੈ ਤਨੁ ਕਾਹੇ ਕਅੁ ਡਰਾਇ’ ਬਲਕਿ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੇ ਜਿਸ ਖ਼ਾਲਸੇ ਦੀ ਸਿਰਜਣਾ ਕੀਤੀ ਉਸ ਨੂੰ ਵੀ ਅਜਿੱਤ ਬਣਾ ਦਿੱਤਾ। ‘ਨ ਡਰੋਂ ਅਰਿ ਸੋਂ ਜਬ ਜਾਇ ਲਰੋਂ॥ ਅਤ ਹੀ ਰਨ ਮੈ ਤਬ ਜੂਝ ਮਰੋਂ’ ਦੀ ਐਸੀ ਪ੍ਰੇਰਣਾ ਭਰੇ ਮਾਰਗ ਤੇ ਆਪ ਚਲੇ ਅਤੇ ਚੱਲਣ ਦੀ ਪ੍ਰੇਰਣਾ ਦਿੱਤੀ ‘ਨਿਸਚੈ ਕਰ ਆਪਨੀ ਜੀਤ ਕਰੋਂ’ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ ਵਿਚ ਮੁੜ ਕਿਸੇ ਖ਼ਾਲਸਈ ਫ਼ੌਜ ਜਾਂ ਜਥੇ ਨੇ ਅਧੀਨਗੀ ਕਬੂਲ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤੀ ਅਤੇ ‘ਪੁਰਜਾ ਪੁਰਜਾ ਕਟਿ ਮਰੈ ਕਬਹੂ ਨ ਛਾਡੈ ਖੇਤੁ’ ਨੂੰ ਪ੍ਰਤੱਖ ਮੂਰਤੀਮਾਨ ਕਰ ਦਿਖਾਇਆ ਭਾਵੇਂ ਮੀਰ ਮੰਨੂੰ, ਜ਼ਕਰੀਆ ਖਾਂ, ਨਾਦਰਸ਼ਾਹ, ਅਬਦਾਲੀ ਸੀ ਜਾਂ ਬ੍ਰਿਟਿਸ਼ ਸਮਰਾਜ ਸੀ।
ਮਾਤਾ ਗੁਜਰੀ ਜੀ ਅਤੇ ਪਿਤਾ ਧਰਮ ਦੀ ਚਾਦਰ ਨੌਵੇਂ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਗੁਰੂ ਤੇਗ ਬਹਾਦਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੀ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ ਅਰਾਧਨਾ ਤੋਂ ਪ੍ਰਸੰਨ ਹੋ ਕੇ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਗ੍ਰਹਿ ਪਟਨਾ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਵਿਖੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦਾ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ ਹੋਇਆ
ਤਾਤ ਮਾਤ ਮੁਰ ਅਲਖ ਅਰਾਧਾ॥ ਬਹੁ ਬਿਧਿ ਜੋਗ ਸਾਧਨਾ ਸਾਧਾ॥ ਤਿਨ ਜੋ ਕਰੀ ਅਲਖ ਕੀ ਸੇਵਾ॥ ਤਾ ਤੇ ਭਏ ਪ੍ਰਸੰਨ ਗੁਰਦੇਵਾ॥ ਤਿਨ ਪ੍ਰਭ ਜਬ ਆਇਸ ਮੁਹਿ ਦੀਯਾ॥ ਤਬ ਹਮ ਜਨਮ ਕਲੂ ਮਹਿ ਲੀਯਾ॥ ਜਬ ਹੀ ਜਾਤ ਤ੍ਰਿਬੇਣੀ ਭਏ॥ ਪੁੰਨ ਦਾਨ ਤਿਨ ਕਰਤ ਬਿਤਏ॥ ਤਹੀ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ ਹਮਾਰਾ ਭਯੋ॥ ਪਟਨਾ ਸਹਰ ਬਿਖੈ ਭਵ ਲਯੋ॥
ਆਪਣੀ ਸਵੈ-ਜੀਵਨੀ ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ ਵਿਚ ਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਇਹ ਵੀ ਬਿਆਨ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਮੈਂ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ ਚਰਨਾਂ ਵਿਚ ਐਸਾ ਜੁੜਿਆ ਹੋਇਆ ਸੀ ਕਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਇਸ ਦੁਨੀਆ ’ਤੇ ਆਉਣ ਦਾ ਮੰਨ ਨਹੀ ਸੀ ‘ਚਿਤ ਨ ਭਯੋ ਹਮਰੋ ਆਵਨ ਕਹ॥ ਚੁਭੀ ਰਹੀ ਸ੍ਰੁਤਿ ਪ੍ਰਭ ਚਰਨਨ ਮਹਿ’ ਪਰ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਨੇ ਸਮਝਾਇਆ ਤੇ ਆਦੇਸ਼ ਦਿੱਤਾ ‘ਮੈ ਅਪੁਨਾ ਸੁਤ ਤੋਹਿ ਨਿਵਾਜਾ॥ ਪੰਥੁ ਪ੍ਰਚੁਰ ਕਰਬੇ ਕਹੁ ਸਾਜਾ॥ ਜਾਹਿ ਤਹਾਂ ਤੈ ਧਰਮ ਚਲਾਇ॥ ਕਬੁਧਿ ਕਰਨ ਤੇ ਲੋਕ ਹਟਾਇ’ ਗੁਰੂ ਦਸਮੇਸ਼ ਨੇ 42 ਸਾਲ ਦੀ ਇਸ ਹਯਾਤੀ ਦਾ ਇੱਕ-ਇੱਕ ਛਿਨ ‘ਧਰਮ ਚਲਾਵਨ ਸੰਤ ਉਬਾਰਨ॥ ਦੁਸਟ ਸਭਨ ਕੋ ਮੂਲ ਉਪਾਰਨਿ॥’ ਦੇ ਰੱਬੀ-ਆਦੇਸ਼ ਦੀ ਪੂਰਤੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੀ ਸਫਲਾ ਕੀਤਾ। ਜਿਸ ਧਰਮ ਦੀ ਨੀਂਹ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਦੇਵ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਰੱਖੀ ਸੀ, ਉਸੇ ਨੂੰ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਖ਼ਾਲਸਾ ਪੰਥ ਦੇ ਰੂਪ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੰਪੂਰਨ ਕੀਤਾ। ‘ਸੰਗਤਿ ਕੀਨੀ ਖਾਲਸਾ’ ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਵਿੱਚ ਪ੍ਰਵੇਸ਼ ਲਈ ‘ਸਿਰੁ ਧਰਿ ਤਲੀ ਗਲੀ ਮੇਰੀ ਆਉ’ ਦੀ ਜੋ ਸ਼ਰਤ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਨੇ ਨਿਸ਼ਚਿਤ ਕੀਤੀ ਸੀ ਦਸਵੀਂ ਜੋਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਅਨੰਦਪੁਰ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਕੇਸਗੜ੍ਹ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਵਿਖੇ ਭਰੇ ਦਰਬਾਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਸੀਸ ਦੀ ਮੰਗ ਕੀਤੀ ਤਾਂ ਪੰਜ ਸਿੱਖ ਗੁਰੂ ਨੂੰ ਸੀਸ ਅਰਪਤ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਨਿਤਰੇ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਪੰਜ ਪਿਆਰਿਆਂ ਦੀ ਅਗਵਾਈ ਵਿੱਚ ਫਿਰ ਹਜ਼ਾਰਾਂ ਸੰਗਤਾਂ ਇਸ ਸੀਸ ਭੇਟ ਮਾਰਗ ’ਤੇ ਤੁਰ ਪਈਆਂ ਅਤੇ ਖਾਲਸਾ-ਪੰਥ ਨੂੰ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ਮਾਨ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਿਸ ਨੇ ਜਾਲਮਾਂ ਦੀਆਂ ਤਲਵਾਰਾਂ ਖੁੰਢੀਆਂ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤੀਆਂ’ ਹਮਲਾਵਰਾਂ ਦੇ ਮੂੰਹ ਮੋੜ ਦਿੱਤੇ, ਲੋਕ-ਸ਼ਕਤੀ ਨੂੰ ਉਜਾਗਰ ਕੀਤਾ ਅਤੇ ਮਨੁੱਖੀ-ਸਮਾਜ ਨੂੰ ਡਰ-ਭੈ ਅਤੇ ਗ਼ੁਲਾਮੀ ਦੇ ਸੰਗਲਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਅਜ਼ਾਦ ਕਰਵਾਇਆ।
ਖ਼ਾਲਸਾ ਕੇਵਲ ਇਕ ਮਨੁੱਖ ਲਈ ਵਰਤੀ ਗਈ ਸੰਗਿਆਂ ਨਹੀਂ ਬਲਕਿ ਇਕ ਰੱਬੀ-ਲਹਿਰ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਅਮਰ ਹੈ, ਅਜਿੱਤ ਹੈ, ਸਦੀਵੀ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਹਰ ਔਖ-ਸੌਖ ਵਿੱਚ ਚੜ੍ਹਦੀ ਕਲਾ ਦੀ ਜੈਕਾਰ ਕਰਦੀ ਹੈ ‘ਨਾਨਕ ਨਾਮ ਚੜ੍ਹਦੀ ਕਲਾ॥ ਤੇਰੇ ਭਾਣੇ ਸਰਬਤ ਦਾ ਭਲਾ’ ਗੁਰੂ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਨੇ ਖੰਡੇ-ਬਾਟੇ ਦਾ ਅੰਮ੍ਰਿਤ ਬਖਸ਼ ਉਨਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਸੰਤ-ਸਿਪਾਹੀ ਬਣਾ ਖ਼ਾਲਸਾ-ਪੰਥ ਸਾਜਿਆ ਗੁਰੂ ਤੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਇਕ ਦੂਜੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਅਭੇਦ ਹੋ ਗਏ ਜਦੋਂ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਨੇ ਐਲਾਨ ਕੀਤਾ ਕਿ ‘ਖਾਲਸਾ ਮੇਰੋ ਰੂਪ ਹੈ ਖਾਸ। ਖਾਲਸਹਿ ਮਹਿ ਹੌਂ ਕਰੋਂ ਨਿਵਾਸ।….. ……ਜਾ ਮਹਿ ਰੰਚ ਨ ਮਿਥਿਆ ਭਾਖੀ। ਪਰਾਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਸਾਖ਼ੀ।’
ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਪਰਮ ਪੁਰਖ ਦੇ ਅਜੇਹੇ ਦਾਸ ਹਨ ਜੋ ਮਨੁੱਖੀ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ ਵਿੱਚ ਇਕੱਲੇ ਹਨ ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੇ ਸਭ ਕੁਝ ਕੁਰਬਾਨ ਕਰਕੇ ਵੀ ਜਗਤ ਦਾ ਤਮਾਸ਼ਾ ਦੇਖਿਆ ਅਤੇ ਮਾਨਿਆ ਹੈ। ਹਰ ਕਲਮ, ਹਰ ਬੋਲ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਦਾ ਅਲੌਕਿਕ ਹੈ ਤੇ ਸਭ ਕੁਝ ਕੁਰਬਾਨ ਕਰਨ ਦਾ ਜੀਵਨ ਇਤਿਹਾਸ ਵੇਖ ਜੀਭ ਦੰਦਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਲੈ ਲਈਦੀ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਐਸੀ ਅਗੰਮ-ਜੋਤਿ ਵੀ ਕਦੀ ਮਨੁੱਖੀ ਸਰੀਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਆਈ ਹੋਵੇਗੀ? ਇਹ ਮੰਨਣਾ ਸੰਭਵ ਨਹੀਂ ਪਰ ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਗੁਰੂ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਆਪ ਹੀ ਹੁਕਮਨ ਵਰਜ ਗਏ ਕਿ ‘ਜੋ ਹਮ ਕੋ ਪਰਮੇਸਰ ਉਚਰਿਹੈ॥ ਤੇ ਸਭ ਨਰਕਿ ਕੁੰਡ ਮਹਿ ਪਰਿਹੈ॥’। ਮੈ ਤਾਂ ਕੇਵਲ ਉਸ ਦਾ ਦਾਸ ਹਾਂ ‘ਮੋਕੋ ਦਾਸ ਤਵਨ ਕਾ ਜਾਨੋ॥ ਯਾ ਮੈ ਭੇਦੁ ਨ ਰੰਚ ਪਛਾਨੋ॥’ ਜੇ ਉਹ ਖ਼ਾਲਸਾ ਸਾਜਦੇ ਹਨ ਤਾਂ ਉਸ ਨੂੰ ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਦੇ ਆਦੇਸ਼ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਦੇ ਲੜ੍ਹ ਲਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ ‘ਗੁਰੁਬਰ ਅਕਾਲ ਕੇ ਹੁਕਮ ਸਿਉਂ ਉਪਜਿਓ ਬਿਗਿਆਨਾ। ਤਬ ਸਹਿਜੇ ਰਚਿਓ ਖਾਲਸਾ ਸਾਬਤ ਮਰਦਾਨਾ। ਜੇ ਉਹ ਬਾਣੀ ਉਚਾਰਦੇ ਹਨ ਤਾਂ ‘ਗੁਰ ਪ੍ਰਸਾਦਿ, ਤ੍ਵ ਪ੍ਰਸਾਦਿ, ਕਬਿਯੋ ਬਾਚ ਬੇਨਤੀ ਚੌਪਈ’ ਹੀ ਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਆਪਣਾ ਆਪ ਵੀ ਸ਼ਬਦ ਵਿੱਚ ਅਭੇਦ ਕਰ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਜੀ ਨੂੰ ਗੁਰੂ-ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਦੀ ਪਦਵੀ ਬਖਸ਼ ਸਦੀਵੀ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਥਾਪ ਦਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ।
ਕੌਮ ਦੀ ਅਗਵਾਈ ਉਹ ਕਰ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਨਿੱਜ-ਪ੍ਰਸਤ ਨਹੀਂ ਮੌਕਾ ਪ੍ਰਸਤ ਤੇ ਪਰਿਵਾਰ-ਪ੍ਰਸਤ ਨਹੀਂ ਬਲਕਿ ਸਿੱਖ ਸੇਵਕਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਪੁੱਤਰ ਤੇ ਸਭ ਕੁਝ ਵਾਰ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ। ‘ਇਨ ਪੁੱਤਰਨ ਕੇ ਸੀਸ ਪਰ ਵਾਰ ਦੀਏ ਸੁਤ ਚਾਰ। ਚਾਰ ਮੂਏ ਤੋ ਕਿਆ ਹੂਆ ਜੀਵਤ ਕਈ ਹਜਾਰ’ ਕਿਸੇ ਦੇ ਸਰੀਰ ਨੂੰ ਉੱਚਾ-ਨੀਵਾਂ ਜਾਂ ਪਿਆਰਾ ਨਹੀਂ ਕਿਹਾ ਬਲਕਿ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਖ਼ਾਲਸਈ ਜੀਵਨ ਨੂੰ ਉੱਚਾ-ਸੁੱਚਾ ਕਿਹਾ ਹੈ। ‘ਰਹਿਤ ਪਿਆਰੀ ਮੁਝ ਕੋ ਸਿੱਖ ਪਿਆਰਾ ਨਾਹਿ। ਰਹਣੀ ਰਹੈ ਸੋਈ ਸਿੱਖ ਮੇਰਾ। ਉਹ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਮੈਂ ਉਸਕਾ ਚੇਰਾ।’ ਅੱਜ ਗੁਰੂ ਪਾਤਸ਼ਾਹ ਦੀਆਂ ਇੰਨੀਆਂ ਮਹਾਨ ਬਖਸ਼ਿਸ਼ਾਂ ਵੱਲ ਪਿੱਠ ਕਰਕੇ ਖੜੇ ਹਾਂ ਅਸੀਂ ਰਹਿਤ-ਬਹਿਤ ਤੋਂ ਊਣੇ ਸਿਰ-ਮੂੰਹ ਘੋਨ-ਮੋਨ ਕਰਵਾ ਕੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਆਪ ਨੂੰ ਪੰਥ-ਪ੍ਰਤੀਨਿਧੀ ਸੰਸਥਾਵਾਂ ਦਾ ਆਗੂ ਦਰਸਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਾਂ। ਸਿੱਖ ਦੇ ਗੁਰੂ-ਪ੍ਰੇਮ ਦੀ ਇਕੋ ਨਿਸ਼ਾਨੀ ਅਤੇ ਸ਼ਰਤ ਅੰਤਿਮ ਸਵਾਸਾਂ ਤੱਕ ਸਿੱਖੀ ਕੇਸਾਂ-ਸੁਆਸਾਂ ਸੰਗ ਨਿਭਾਉਣਾ ਹੀ ਹੈ, ਜੋ ਅਸੀਂ ਹਰ ਰੋਜ਼ ਆਪਣੇ ਸ਼ਹੀਦਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਅਰਦਾਸ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਸਿੱਜਦਾ ਕਰਦਿਆਂ ਹੋਇਆਂ ਦੁਹਰਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਾਂ ‘ਸਿੱਖੀ ਕੇਸਾਂ ਸੁਆਸਾਂ ਸੰਗ ਨਿਭਾਈ। ਸਿੱਖੀ ਨਿਭਣ ਦੀ ਇਕੋ ਨਿਸ਼ਾਨੀ ਕੇਸ ਹੈ। ਕੋਈ ਗੁਰੂ ਦੇ ਪਿਆਰ ਦਾ ਬੱਧਾ ਹੀ ਦੇਸ਼-ਪ੍ਰਦੇਸ਼ ਵਿੱਚ ਬੈਠਾ ਪਦਾਰਥਾਂ ਦੇ ਇਸ ਮਾਇਆ-ਜਾਲ, ਫੈਸ਼ਨ-ਪ੍ਰਸਤੀ ਦੇ ਜ਼ਮਾਨੇ ਵਿੱਚ ਆਪਣੀ ਸਾਬਤ-ਸੂਰਤ ਕਾਇਮ ਰੱਖ ਸਕਦਾ ਹੈ। ਜਿਸ ਦਾ ਆਪਣੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਦਸਮੇਸ਼ ਨਾਲ ਪਿਆਰ ਹੈ, ਉਹੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਦਸਮੇਸ਼ ਦਾ ਪਿਆਰਾ ਹੋਣ ਦਾ ਹੱਕਦਾਰ ਹੈ। ਅੱਜ ਸਾਡੇ ਤੋਂ ਸਭ ਕੁਝ ਕੁਰਬਾਨ ਕਰ ਜਾਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਦੀ ਬਖਸ਼ੀ ਰਹਿਤ ਦੇ ਆਪ ਧਾਰਨੀ ਹੋਈਏ ਤੇ ਹੋਰਨਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਪ੍ਰੇਰਨਾਂ ਦੇਈਏ ਤਾਂ ਹੀ ਸਾਡਾ ਇਸ ਦੁਨੀਆਂ ਤੇ ਆਇਆ ਸਫ਼ਲਾ ਹੋਵੇਗਾ।
 
ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕਾ ਖਾਲਸਾ। ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂ ਜੀ ਕੀ ਫ਼ਤਹ

Note: This is an old article in my library, i am not aware of the writer but i share here for you to see a glimpse of light in life of Guru Gobind Singh ji.
Ajmer Singh Randhawa.

How Election Commission of India cheats with voters to benefit major political parties?

April 12, 2014
I could never hope if Election commission of India will ever cheat with voters but here i too feel cheated. I searched for the name of candidate and his symbol and voted but to a wrong person not of my choice.
—————————————————————Voters in Punjab —please be cautious of dummy candidates with same name and almost a similar symbol in fray!

I found a candidate Jarnail singh with his election symbol SHUTTLECOCK almost in double sized which appeared me as BROOM was there. No body goes through all the symbols when go to cast his/her vote. These dummy candidates shall never be available on their phone or at their homes.
I could never hope if Election commission of India will ever cheat with voters but here i too feel cheated. I searched for the name of candidate and his symbol and voted but to a wrong person not of my choice.

Now i have come to know that i have voted to dummy candidate. This dummy candidates takes away the votes of any famous personality and are funded/promoted by opponents as in this case Congress and BJP was feared of success of Jarnail Singh so they played a malicious trick to defeat Jarnail Singh. I rightly call these parties big sharks and they are well aware of such tricks. The bureaucracy works for these parties.

It seems that Election commission of India has benefitted deliberately to Congress & BJP.

I am sure Jarnail Singh might have lost due to this malicious move. The nexus between BJP+Congress exposed here once again as none complained and objected to election commission. 

ImageAnyway the candidates of AAP in Punjab needs to be more cautious and vigilant, check the serial number of their button on EVM, inform the voters to press the button at that given number only.
Ajmer Singh Randhawa

AAP Ticket to contest Parlimentary election by Jarnail Singh

April 8, 2014

JOURNALIST_JARNAIL SINGH

News 24 objects on ticket to Jarnail Singh and remarks result of flunged shoe on Chidambaram. It may be true but another reason is his revelation on 1984 in his book which is ignored by media. Well if we accept shoe flung award then is it worst then giving award to Devendra Nath Pande and Bholanath pande on hijacking a plane and demand release of Indira gandhi ?

Sant Jarnail Singh was also irritated on treachrously killing of hijacker Manjit Singh alias Musibat Singh at Rajasansi airport on 20 Aug. 1982. He commented that there were two laws in india, Pande brothers were awarded for hijacking whereas a Sikh was shot dead without trials. See evidence at

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=aoMXn_lR1XYC&pg=PT75&lpg=PT75&dq=Hijacker+Pande+brothers&source=bl&ots=IBuS5D2B0o&sig=KlyW9fmVCvVDJsQnEjX3QX64n1Q&hl=en&sa=X&ei=6v5DU_mgGY2trAelyoCQBA&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=Hijacker%20Pande%20brothers&f=false

So justify yourself whether bhai Jarnail Singh is a right candidate or not,  representing Sikh community in next Parliament through AAM AADMI PARTY He has good knowledge on Sikh genocide and well aware of these perpetrators sitting in Parliament for the last 30 years. Congress protects them and provide top security whereas the victims are being harassed in India, they have to attend every date in Court with the hope of justice which is denied to them. The perpetrators and Chief organizers are rarely questioned as Indian govt. was itself a party in this holocaust. Sikh nation have it’s hopes on Bhai Jarnail Singh and we also are grateful to Arvind Kejriwal for his support to Sikh nation on their demand of justice.

Sikhs all over India should cast their vote only to AAP as both Congress and BJP’s hands are stained with blood of innocent Sikhs.

Hijack a Plane, Get Rewarded by Govt of India.

Did you know that an Indian airplane was hijacked on Dec 20th, 1978? Indira Gandhi was in prison for her crimes. Here’s what the Wiki notes in the list of aircraft hijackings in the 1970s:

December 20, 1978: Devendra Nath Pandey and Bhola Nath Pandey hijacked Indian Airlines flight IC-410. They demanded the immediate release of Indian National Congress party leader Indira Gandhi who was imprisoned at that time on the charges of fraud and misconduct. Later, they were awarded with party tickets for this act by the Indira Gandhi government in 1980 such that Devendra Nath Pandey rose to become a minister in the government of most populous state of India, Uttar Pradesh. This case was also mentioned by Jarnail Singh Bhindrawale to justify his claim regarding the hypocrisy of the Indian government. {Emphasis added.}
[Hat tip: Aditya Kuvalekar.]

Let me repeat the important bits:
1. Indira Gandhi was in prison for her crimes. She was a criminal serving time in prison.

2. A criminal act was done — hijacking of an aircraft — to free a criminal — Indira Gandhi. (This is not unusual. An Indian Airlines plane was hijacked and taken to Kandahar some years later, which led to the freeing of Islamic terrorists.)

3. The criminals who hijacked the plane were rewarded by Indira Gandhi.

And for that we have the Indian capital’s airport named the “Indira Gandhi International Airport.” Is it any surprise that the Indian parliament and the government is bursting at the seams with criminals and crooks. India is a kakistocracy — rule by the most corrupt and the least principled.

Why is India a kakistocracy? Because Indians are collectively ignorant. Many of us have little bits of information about the criminality of politicians — both past and present — but this information is mostly private and generally not widely known. We have to make this information shard public information so that it becomes common knowledge.

History matters. Ignorance of what happened and why can be seriously damaging. If we don’t know why and how we got to this sorry state of affairs, we will never be able to fix the system. If we are ignorant of how awfully disastrous the Nehru-Gandhi family led Congress party has been for India, we will never be able to set India on a path of recovery because the same mindset motivates the current Congress party.

Let’s work together to collect all the Nehru-Gandhi horror stories into a comprehensive volume. And then let’s make it not just general knowledge but common knowledge.
- See more at: http://www.deeshaa.org/2011/12/23/hijack-a-plane-get-rewarded-by-govt-of-india/#sthash.FPiOG38i.dpuf

Report by;
Ajmer Singh Randhawa.

Sikhs marching Haridwar on Baisakhi day

April 8, 2014

 

Kindly share and forward the message quickly to every home of Sikh. If Sikhs shall not come forward to get back the possession of their historical gurudwara Gian Godri at Har Ki Pauri, who else will make efforts?

So come forward, the DSGMC or SGPC has no interest as their lips are tightened by Badal as he has political alliance with these fanatic Hindu organizations who are responsible to demolish the Gurudwara.

DSGMC could play politics in Tilak Vihar to possess disputed land, being renovated by a Sikh Seva org. but it has no guts to come openly and march to Haridwar to take the possession back from administration and rebuild the Gurudwara at centuries old historical place. They are KAGZI SHER, who can block traffic and cordon off a police station in Sikh dominated area, hence they are cowards.

So Sikh youths are appealed to join the march at 5.00 am at Gurudwara Rakabganj on 14-04-2014.

Please contact Gurcharan Singh Babbar at 9971359517 & 9312262300, Delhi.

Finally Sikhs threaten to take back Har-ki-Paudi site

April 7, 2014

An appeal to Sikh panth to march Haridwar on Bisakhi day 14-04-2014 from Gurudwara Rakabganj Sahib ji, Delhi, to get the possesion of land of Gurudwara GIAN GODRI AT HAR KI PAURI, HARIDWAR which was demolished by Gvt. of UP in 1984. Please contact Gurcharan Singh babbar for more detail. March will start at 5.00 am on 14/04/2014 on Bisakhi day.

Earlier Shiromani Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee had announced to build the Gurudwara.  When Baba Baljit Singh Daduwal marched to get the control of this site and build the gurudwara there in December 2012. He was arrested at Paonta Sahib, at the border of Himachal-Uttrakhand with his 700 followers. The marchers started from Amritsar and were marching to the site in Hardwar. When they entered Uttaranachal state, they were arrested. They were told they were forbidden to enter the state. Police took them in buses to the police station. On the way, they recited Gurbani and kirtan and sang hymns.  But since the SGPC only remained a silent spectator and did nothing to build the Gurudwara there so finally Sikhs are compelled to take a final decision as justice is never done with Sikhs in India.

kindly see through the google earth the main Gurudwara Gyan Godri was situated at Har ki paudi. It was demolished in 1984 Sikh genocide.

The main sewadar Bibi Rampyari did sewa for many years here, then her daughter did the sewa but she was killed by fanatic Hindus in 1984. The whereabouts of her family is not known.

The other examples of demolition of Sikh holy places/historical gurudwaras are Gurudwara Paonta Sahib ji and Gurudwara Pawwa sahib at Gwalior http://gurudwarademolished.blogspot.com/

 

425648_3906827121554_1070642965_n

Finally Sikhs threaten to take back Har-ki-Paudi site

HARIDWAR: All India Sikh Conference (Babbar) president Guru Charan Singh Babbar, in a letter to the Uttarakhand chief minister Harish Rawat, threatened that his community would assemble in large numbers at Har-ki-Paudi on April 14, to forcibly reclaim the land on which the Gurudwara Sri Gyan Godadi Saheb stood.The warning was issued in a letter addressed to chief minister Harish Rawat on April 4. April 14 is also the Baisakhi bathing day, when a large number of devout Hindus will take a holy dip in the Ganga.In the letter, Guru Charan Singh Babbar had requested the state government to free the gurudwara land, illegally occupied during the anti-Sikh riots of 1984.
The government was instructed to act in the matter by Baisakhi this year (April 14).The letter warned that in case the state administration failed to free the land that belonged to the gurudwara of illegal occupants, “we will reclaim the Gurudwara, even if it means sacrificing our lives.”

Babbar told TOI that Sikhs had been agitating for the gurudwara’s restoration to the community for the last four years. It was particularly dear to them, as it had been built about 450 years ago to commemorate Guru Nanak Saheb’s long stay at Har-ki-Paudi during a visit to Haridwar.

Taking advantage of the anti-Sikh sentiments in the aftermath of then prime minister Indira Gandhi’s assassination in 1984, “some criminals demolished the Gurudwara and illegally occupied the place,” Babbar remarked.

The site has been turned into a Bharat Scouts and Guides office, he said. While the Sikhs insist that the site be handed back to rebuild gurudwara, the administration proposed that the community accept another site for building a gurudwara. That proposal was not acceptable to the Sikh Conference, Babar said.

Copy of the letter sent to CM,Uttrakhand.

DATED: 05/04/2014

MOST URGENT
D.M.SAHAB
Haridwar

Sub: We are coming to take the possession of historical demolished Gurdwara Shri Gyan Godri Sahib jee Haridwar near Har-ki-paudi on 14/4/2014.

Respected D.M.Sahab

We would like to inform you regarding the above mentioned subject . Kindly protect and support us otherwise the Government of Uttarakhand will be fully responsible for any mishappening.

We hope you will consider our genuine request in the interest of justice as well as the unity and integrity of the great nation.

Thanking you
Gurcharan Singh Babbar
Mobile no: 09971359517, 09312262300

Cc to:-
(i) Shri Pranab Mukherjee (President of India)
(ii) Shri Hameed Ansari ji (Vice President of India)
(iii) Dr.Manmohan Singh Ji (Prime Minister of India)
(iv) Shri Susheel Kumar Shinde ji (Home Minister of India)
(v) Shri Harish Rawat ji (Chief Minister Govt of Uttarakhand)
(vi) Governor Sahab (Govt of Uttarakhand)
(vii) Director General Police (Govt of uttarakhand)
(viii) S.S.P (Haridwar)
(ix) City Magistrate ( Haridwar)

Forwarded by;
Ajmer Singh Randhawa

Current report and the reasons behind disturbance by DSGMC in Tilak vihar, Delhi.

April 3, 2014

Image

Manjinder Singh Sirsa & Manjit Singh GK, conmen of DSGMC. 

Why did Manjinder Singh Sirsa broke opened the Lock at disputed govt.property which was earlier locked by Police to ensure peace and harmony in the locality? Then AKHAND PATH started, Nishan sahib fixed up and unfurled, Police kept on watching. Police was falsely assured by Sirsa that they will vacate the building once Akhand path is completed but on Tuesday soon after bhog ceremony, Sirsa and GK announced a series of 51 Akhand path one after one just to keep the possesion in their hands? Who allowed them to misuse sarup of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji which caused dis-respect and Akhand Path disturbed? Are these both the conmen not responsible for this disrespect and then playing with religious sentiments of Sikhs? Is this not an attempt for political benefits to BJP in coming election? 

Are the authorities fools?

In such case when election are going to be held just after one week, the administration took a prompt action and failed the malicious move of DSGMC which is keen to provoke Sikhs on a religious issue by hurting their religious sentiments on disrespect of Guru Granth sahib ji and on Nishan Sahib but people are not blind. This is Delhi not Punjab where people are more educated.  The confiscated sarup was taken to Gurudwara Sisganj by Police and handed over with due respect to management there as reports received. Police also videographed to record whole action in camera which they will produce at right time.

Akal dal forms alliance with BJP in Punjab and here a candidate Pravesh Chandra is in fray from BJP + Akali Dal Badal. It fired the situation to gain in coming election, Congress too tried to fuel in fire.

There only motto is to defame AAP and woo the voters towards their side which is an uphill task. The popularity of Jarnail Singh ji has frustrated them.

I had predicted it few months ago of repeat of violence and disturbance in Tilak vihar locality when Police opened fire on these poor victims of 1984 and Mahabal Mishra (Congress MP) did nothing for these people instead he supported the Balmikis of the area.

This said building was an old heritage home, a ruined building in locality. We people met the local MLA OP  Babbar and requested him to hand over this building to Seva84 which is working for the upliftment of victims of 1984 and working in the field of education and medical other then religion also.

He inquired through his sources and was delighted to see Seva84 charity work in the area. He granted permission and allowed us to use the building and assured that legal possesion shall also be given to soon. But unfortunately BJP lost the Assembly elections and he couldn’t do much to keep his words but he was firmed on his decision. Luckily it was Jarnail Singh, A Sikh person elected MLA from this area from AAP. He too supported mission of Seva84.

On the contrary Ravi Singh of Khalsa Aid, UK entered into scene in the area, our volunteer Jagdish Singh cheated us by not giving full account details of expenditure on renovation of this building. Seva84 spent nearly Rs. 3.5 lacs on renovation but details of expenditure we were provided was only amounting two lacs. We persued jagdish Singh to give us full detail. He contacted Ravi Singh and Ravi Singh of Khalsa aid provoked him to not to give any detail ti us and lured him to work for khalsa aid, Few volunteers from Patiala contacted Jagdish singh, they planned to give Uniforms to school children. Our center was chosen for this purpose without informing us but we remained silent as the charity work for victim families was being carried out. And then it was locked by Jagdish Singh, he became in-charge with consent of Ravi Singh of khalsa aid.

We approached OP Babbar and contacted Jarnail Singh local MLA, they got annoyed on role of Jagdish Singh and Ravi Singh of Khalsa Aid. They came to the center. Police was called by them and they locked the buiding, the keys were given to In-charge Tilak nagar police station to avoid any conflict between different groups of people as still it was a govt. property.

Now shrewd Jagdish Singh met Manjit Singh GK and Manjinder Singh Sirsa, convinced them to take possession of this building. They were lured and Manjinder Singh Sirsa visited Tilak vihar. He broke opened the lock of Police and started an Akhand Path there on this Sunday.  I was informed by some of our volunteers. I decided to call Sirsa as both of us are good friends for the past many years but to my dismay when I called him on Monday the 31st March, his PA received the phone, I gave him my introduction. He assured me to call back when Sirsa comes. I kept waiting but as Sirsa is now holding high profile seat, he ignored my call. I wished to warn him to keep his dirty hands away from this issue as this building was renovated by my team but unfortunately Sirsa missed the opportunity.

And rest you have already read in the beginning of the post how DSGMC caused the dis-respect to Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji, used the sarup for illegal possession and then to hurt religious sentiments of Sikh nation to benefit BJP and congress in coming elections and damage the popularity of Jarnail Singh of AAP.  I feel ashamed of these leaders of DSGMC who didn’t hesitate to incite Sikhs to disturb peace and harmony in the area for political advantage only. If they continue playing to play with sentiments of Sikh nation, we shall oppose them in their every move as we did earlier to uproot Sarna. If sangat of Delhi chosen them to lead Sikh samaj in Delhi, they should respect the mandate and honor it otherwise their future shall be no different them then Sarna.

Ajmer Singh Randhawa.

Are we Indians fools?

April 2, 2014

Image

Are we Indians fools?

Sonia Gandhi, President UPA filed her nomination form from Raebarely, UP.

She declared her total property valued as Rs. 2,81,50,387.

There may be hundreds or thousands of women may be having this much valued property or cash in their accounts in India so one should not have any objection but ……..

Someone is lying, either the records which shows her sixth richest lady in world.

Whether sixth richest lady have this little valued asset only? Either those magazines lie who publish these records and even called Sonia richest then Queen of England but declaration form is an authenticated statement filled by candidate so i wonder who is lying?

If no body is lying than i think we are certainly born fools.

*****FORBESWOMAN | 10/30/2013 @ 7:51AM |19,888 views

The World’s Nine Most Powerful Women 2013

Comment Now Follow Comments

This year there are nine women on FORBES’ list of The World’s Most Powerful People, representing 12% of the ranking — in stark contrast to being 50% of the world’s population. Both 2011 and 2012 featured six women leaders. The year previous had five and the inaugural list from 2009 included only 3 — or just 4.4%. Recently elected Park Geun-hye of South Korea joins the other heads of state German Chancellor Angela Merkel (No.5), Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff (No. 20) and de facto head of India Sonia Gandhi (No. 21). Two of the world’s most important NGO’s are run by women: Christine Lagarde (No. 35) leads the IMF and Margaret Chan (No. 59) steers the World Health Organization.
http://www.forbes.com/…/the-worlds-nine-most-powerful…/

*****

A popular US news website, the Huffington Post, has regretted the “confusion” caused by the inclusion of the name of Congress president Sonia Gandhi in which it listed the Congress president’s wealth in a rich leaders global list.

Sonia Gandhi’s name was deleted from the list of the wealthiest people in the world after it caused much hue and cry, with the Congress Party in India leading the outcry, saying the assets had no bearing on reality.

The removal of the name occurred shortly after the Congress derided the website for the “absurd and ridiculous” item.

“Our editors have been unable to verify the amount, removed the link, and regret any confusion,” the Huffington Post said, four days after it listed Sonia Gandhi as the 12th richest world leader putting her asset to USD 2 billion.

While putting Gandhi’s wealth at USD 2 billion, Huffington Post had not given details of how it arrived at such a figure.

http://www.financialexpress.com/news/sonia-gandhi-wealth-fiasco-forces-uss-huffington-post-to-delete-name-from-rich-list/1202767 

My one friend rightly commented on her declaration as ……..

 Did you ever hear a thief telling exactly how much money is stolen by him / her . Never , a real family thief can’t be so dumb to tell the whole truth. In this reguard if some one is not smart enough to hide the stolen money by him / herself , it is not a single problem . The thief can hire smart people with the same stolen money to let fix the job , no big deal .

DO YOU NEED TO EXPRESS YOUR VIEWS, IF YES – PLEASE COMMENT.

Ajmer Singh Randhawa.

Sikh religion is a separate, distinct, sovereign and complete religion in itself then why do we called a part of Hindu religion?

April 1, 2014

 

Image

Whether we expect for positive explanation in favour of Sikhs from the Supreme Court of India?

In Re; (1) Court Case lodged by Dr. Birendra Kaur reg. amendment of Article 25 Explanation II is pending before the Supreme Court of India;

(2)    Bill introduced by SAD MP Ratan Singh Ajnala is also pending in Parliament;

Whether we expect for positive explanation in favour of Sikhs from the Supreme Court of India?

“SECULARISM AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION”

http://courses.cs.vt.edu/cs3604/lib/Freedom.of.Speech/International/india.secularism.html

 

VERSUS


SIKH- SEPARATE RELIGION

http://khalistannewsblogspotcom.blogspot.com/2013/03/sikh-separate-religion-khalistan-news.html  

Now, let us take a look at Article 25:

 Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion –

 (1)   Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion.

 (2)   Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law -

 (a)   regulating or restricting any economic, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice;(b)   providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus. 

 Explanation I – The wearing and carrying of kirpans shall be deemed to be included in the profession of the Sikh religion. 

 Explanation II – In sub-Clause (b) of clause (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly. 

In a historical sense, Article 25 is unique. Even though Hindu hands wrote it following the British departure in 1947, future Hindu hands have spared it thus far from additional amendment. Those responsible for writing Article 25 were no less cunning and deceptive — they knew how to shelter it behind the barrage of words that only a few could understand. I have attempted to unravel the mystery of Article 25 to the best of my abilities.

With Hindu leaders in charge of Hindu India, the name of the game is unchecked fundamentalist Hinduism, however undesirable it might be to a reasonable mind. But during British-India, this unchecked Hindu fundamentalism came very close to being curbed as recorded in a superbly written book, Mother India by Katherine Mayo (Greenwood Press Publishers, 1927), which states:

It is true that, to conform to the International Convention for the Suppression of the Circulation of and Traffic in Obscene Publications, signed in Geneva on September 12, 1923, the Indian Legislature duly amended the Indian Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure; and that this amendment duly prescribes set penalties for 

Teachings such as peaceful co-existence, high morals, high ethical values, and respect for fellow humans are integral to any true religion. Given that, why is religious freedom contingent upon factors of public order, morality, and health with respect to religion in India as in Clause 1? Is there such a religion that violates the norms of decent human morality? If indeed there is any such religion, one would think the framers of the Indian Constitution would have alerted us or perhaps would have “banned” that particular immoral religion. Would Hinduism, Islam or for that matter any other religion fall under that category?

“whoever sells, lets to hire, distributes, publicly exhibits … conveys … or receives profit from any obscene object, book, representation or figure.” But its enactment unqualified, although welcome to the Muhammadans, would have wrought havoc with the religious belongings, the ancient traditions and customs and the priestly prerogatives dear to the Hindu majority. Therefore the Indian Legislature, preponderantly Hindu, saddled the amendment with an exception, which reads:

This section does not extend to any book, pamphlet, writing, drawing or painting kept or used bona fide for religious purposes or any represented sculptured, engraved, painted or otherwise represented on or in any temple, or on any car used for the conveyance of idols, or kept or used for any religious purpose.

To conclude, in India, the freedom to practice religion is conditional. The power to interpret and exercise the conditional requirements is in the hands of Hindu leaders and nobody else. This is radically different from what is in the United States where the practice of religion is free, unconditional right. Conversely, in modern India, the practice of religion is a “politician-sanctioned” unreliable right.

Clause 2a of Article 25 is muddy at best. Considering the constitutional write-up, it seems religion is composed of economic, political, and worship activities. Anything other than worship activity is termed “secular.” Therefore, in accordance with the constitution, the Indian State has the right to interfere with those activities of the church it considers “secular.” The church, structure included, is after all an economic venture. In a socialist country like India: Organized religions (Christianity, Islam, Sikhism, etc.) with large groups of people interacting among themselves and others amounts to nothing less than political activity. Any propagation of religion will require a number of “secular” tasks: financial, organizational, and personnel activities (just to name a few).

The Indian State can constitutionally restrict any one or all of these “secular” endeavors, thereby effectively hampering genuine propagation of any religion it desires. This has already happened, as illustrated in another fine book – Soft State: A Newspaperman’s Chronicle of India by Bernard D. Nossiter (Harper & Row Publishers, 1970). I suppose one way to be safeguarded from State incursion is for an individual to worship in the open air (which will insure no economic activity) or alone within the confines of a house (which will insure no political activity). How anyone worships individually in these conditions may be beyond the Indian State’s intrusive nature! That’s my hope! 

Now, consider Clause 2b. What does freedom of religion have to do with social welfare and reform? This sub-clause contains a statement with strange wordings that need some scrutiny. First, are Hindu religious institutions of a public character? This term is ambiguous and could mean literally anything or absolutely nothing. My gut feeling is that it pertains to Hindu schools, the temples, and ashrams. Second, is a reference to the “classes” of Hindus? This is an inappropriate western terminology in reference to the Hindu society. Nonetheless, if the term has to be used, the majority of the Hindu population falls into the low class while the minority belongs to the middle and upper classes. Third, what are the “sections” of Hindus? At the lowest common denominator, the bulk of Hindu sections comprise the Vaishnava, Saiva, and Sakti.

The State can regulate the opening of Hindu temples, schools, and/or ashrams to all high, middle or low Hindu classes irrespective of whether one is Vaishnava, Saiva, Saktia, or what have you. This interpretation may be off the mark if I am reading incorrectly because of the use of terms that are vague. Unfortunately, the framers of the constitution missed the crux of the problem.

The Hindu society is governed by caste (or varna), and not just necessarily by the classes and sections. And certainly the caste is not the same thing as class and section. If you feel that the framers of the constitution were themselves not sure of what they wrote or its underlying meaning, they perhaps hoped that the reader would be reassured in the offering of Explanation I and II. If one examines Hindu scriptures, for example the Bhagavad-Gita, it is not uncommon to see that a transition from one topic to another is often disconcertingly abrupt. This is clearly the case here also. 

Explanation I and II are not even remotely connected with Clause 2b. The fact is that Explanation I and Explanation II urgently call for explanations of their own. Explanation I acknowledges the existence of the Sikh religion. Since the issue is the individual religious rights (in Sikhism), the proper word ought to be “kirpan,” not “kirpans.” Moreover, Explanation II is notoriously flawed. Its intent is obvious: the individual members of Sikh, Jain, and Buddhist religions will be referred to as Hindus, and thus retroactively Sikhism, Jainism, and Buddhism are to be considered merely sects of Hinduism. Therefore, the State can interfere with their religious institutions as it sees fit, under the guise of procuring “social reforms.” Since the constitution refuses to delve further, one might ask: Is there a definition or an explanation of what constitute Hinduism? And who really is a Hindu? Answering these questions has been anything but easy and clear in part because both these terms–Hindu and Hinduism—are absent entirely from their varied scriptures and had been sponsored by their colonial masters, both Islamic and British respectively. Scholars over the years have tried their best but failed to address these terms adequately. Of lately the Supreme Court of India has pitched in. For example in 1965, the Court observed that the term “Hindu” referred to “the orthodox Hindu religion which recognizes castes and contains injunctions bases on caste distinctions.” By 1966, the Court stepped in further. Rather than defining the issue, it issued broad guidelines–to be precise three different “standpoints”– which require an art and gift of application to the circumstances. They are worth reading:

First Standpoint: “We find it difficult, if not impossible, to define Hindu religion or even adequately describe it. Unlike other religions in the world, the Hindu religion does not claim any one prophet; it does not worship any one God; it does not subscribe to any one dogma; it does not believe in any one philosophic concept; it does not follow any one set of religious rites or performances; in fact, it does not appear to satisfy the narrow traditional [for traditional, read Western] features of any religion or creed. It may broadly be described as a way of life and nothing more.”

This “guideline” confusing as it can be fails to ascertain whether one is a Hindu or not. To clarify further, the Court introduced the second guideline.

Second Standpoint: Beneath the diversity of Hindu philosophy, the Court found, “lie certain broad concepts which are treated as basic.”

Those broad concepts are: (a) Acceptance of the Vedas as the highest authority in religious and philosophic matters. (b) The great world rhythms. (c) Rebirth and pre-existence. Having pinpointed the “unity” of the creed here, then the Court proceeded to address the final guideline.

Third Standpoint: Addressing the often asked insidious philosophic question as to what is the “ultimate goal of humanity,” the Court answered, “It is release and freedom from the unceasing cycle of births and rebirths….”

Religious literature would call this goal as: SALVATION. But salvation as understood is something pointing to an individual person and not necessarily addressing the collective sense of humanity. Perhaps after recognizing that the Court potentially might open a can of worms, it left the burgeoning issue unanswered by agreeing “there is a great divergence of views ….” 

Rather than adequately resolving the given problem of “Hindu” and “Hinduism,” the Court’s interjection actually complicated the matter and therefore it needed a quick rescue. In searching for the “working formula,” they found in the person of B.G. Tilak (1856-1920), a fiery politically-drenched fundamentalist Hindu, who apparently had once prescribed: “the acceptance of the Vedas with reverence, recognition, of the fact that the means or ways of salvation are diverse; realization of the truth that the number of gods to be worshipped is large.” In the end, thanks to the Court, when all is said and done, it boils down to this: “Hindu” and “Hinduism” are false terms bounded by the foundational hierarchy-arranged caste, aided by the doctrines of karma and reincarnation as its supporting outer boundaries. Inside this rather large hierarchical triangular entity, the framework is supported by myriad hosts of pillars that tighten and cement the construction from inside out: These include worshipping an army of gods and goddesses, incredible loads of superstitions and rituals, yoga, ayurveda, corruption, immoralities, inflicting human rights abuses, self-inflicted psychology guaranteeing brain washing, totalitarian mode of life, real-politics, and war. The list actually is a long one. It’s not too difficult to imagine that separating oneself from Hindu conditioning is next to impossible. 

The word “secularism” is often invoked diligently by the caste Hindus when describing the Indian State in a spirit of nationalistic Hinduism, with an underlying implication of the Hindu expansionist quest to absorb other religions. The western definition of “secularism” is when the State and public policies take precedence over religious considerations. In other words, in the West, there is a separation of church and state. But most Indians, including their leaders, have their own self-serving bizarre definitions. One often cited goes like this: “equal treatment of all the religions by the State.” Is that a desirable goal? If it is then how can any State achieve such a goal? 

In the Indian context, I suppose the easiest way for the State to treat all religions “equally” would be to “get into” every religion equally and if need be, somehow proclaim all religions are one and a part of Hinduism — therefore making everyone in India a Hindu. This is precisely what is happening in India. Since everyone is a Hindu, the leadership expects a response in kind. It usually shows in an intellectually flawed population which has stamped itself with a bogus notion echoed in the buzzword called sameness. This is an expression erroneously viewed as synonymous with equality.

Under this framed scenario, the very thought of discrimination or even persecution of one religion by another need not arise since we are all the same, that is, Hindus. Obviously, this kind of an argument carries a heavy price tag. When told that India’s sacred constitution exudes an egalitarian system, years of Hindu conditioning have transfixed the populace to acquiesce to any communiqué coming down from the top. Few will ever fathom that India’s egalitarianism is not the same sort we know in a Western sense, but is of an entirely different substance. It is rooted in the infamous caste system, or in a more precise language, the Hindu Apartheid. While the caste system is alive, thriving, and functional, India’s Hindu leaders boast of an Indian democracy, ignoring its pervasive underlying segregation and inequality. This sounds magnificently absurd. Many Indian leaders on one hand enjoy the fruits of being born into an elite caste (while the majority of the population rots at the lowest levels of caste), while on the other hand mindlessly they sing the gospel of equality.

The caste being a substructure of Hindu society, the talk of “equality,” “democracy,” and “secularism” reverberates only to mislead the masses. Not surprisingly, this kind of tactical maneuvering to deceive is clearly evident in the Indian Constitution and conspicuous in the State’s public policy and internal propaganda. While Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists have already been “secularized” constitutionally, Christians and Muslims are now also in the process of being “secularized” through state-orchestrated propaganda. Many Indian leaders now call Indian Christians and Muslims as “Christi Hindus” and “Mohammadiya Hindus,” respectively. In addition, some provincial state governments inside India have already enacted anti-conversion laws while others are contemplating ensuring the Hindu population doesn’t slide away into something else. 

Conclusion

Other amendments of the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution guarantee the American people numerous other fundamental rights. These include protection against government officials who might invade their homes and seize property without legal permission (Amendment IV); protection against being “a witness against himself” in any criminal case or being “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” (Amendment V); the right of a person accused of a crime “to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury” (Amendment VI); and protection against “cruel and unusual punishments” (Amendment VIII). Can the Constitution of India match word-for-word the U.S. Bill of Rights? And, if it cannot, can its intentions at least match those of the U.S. Bill of Rights? If reading Articles 19 and 25 has left anyone with a cause for concern, then the remaining portions of Part III of the Indian Constitution should not come as a surprise. After due consideration, it remains unclear if the Indian Constitution guarantees fundamental rights as is generally claimed, despite the endless rhetoric from India’s leaders, its intelligentsia, and its apologists. 

Courtesy;  We are very greatful to G. B. Singh, who is the author of Gandhi: Behind the Mask of Divinity (Prometheus 2004) and Gandhi Under Cross Examination (Sovereign Star 2009).

—————————————————————————————–

Now have a look at this what provision regarding Religion the US Constitution has for its Citizens. They kept it very simple: 

The Bill of Rights

Amendment 1

FREEDOM OF RELIGION, SPEECH, AND THE PRESS; RIGHTS OF ASSEMBLE

AND PETITION 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

 
And the Commentary on the above Constitutional Provision is:

Many countries have made one religion the established (official) church and support it with government funds. This amendment forbids Congress to set up or in any way provide for an established church. It has been interpreted to forbid government endorsement of or aid to religious doctrines. In addition, Congress may not pass laws limiting worship, speech, or the press, or preventing people from meeting peacefully. Congress also may not keep people from asking the government for relief from unfair treatment.

Mention needs to be made here again what was posted about the Hindu Code Bill:

Source: COMPETING NATIONALISM IN SOUTH ASIA by Achin Vanaik Paul R Brass

Orient Blackswan

(Following three paragraphs)

The Hindu Code Bill produced a tendentious legal description of a ‘Hindu’. It included Buddhists, Jains and Sikhs despite their protest. Their pleas to be governed by their own laws were rejected on the grounds that their few differences from Hinduism were not fundamental. It further included anyone who was not a Muslim, Christian, Parsi or Jew and it also mentioned that this code would apply to any Hindu, Buddhist, Jain or Sikh who has merely deviated from the orthodox practice of his religion but has not embraced the Muslim, Christian, Zoroastrian or Jewish religion. Next, it was extended to cover even those who did not profess Hinduism and were not ‘active followers’. Finally, it failed to make or continue regional exemptions.

The bill thus attacked most principles of religious plurality and choice. It first recognised the existence and claims of intermediate and not easily classifiable zones of belief, non-belief, and practice such as discrete belief systems, overlapping religions, non-believers, and regionally specific beliefs and practices, but then proceeded to deny them any legal provenance. The negative description of a Hindu, as one who was not a member of the four excluded religions produced a Hindu so tightly manacled to his/her birth that even non-belief could not provide an exit. Even though the Constitution provided for the right of non-belief and atheism, the reformed Hindu law took away the freedom of legal self-definition and self-designation from individuals born in Hindu families. Thus, despite its open assimilation, it instituted a new primordialism, even as it described more people as ‘Hindu’ than had ever been done before and included people who had no stake in being so defined.

Thus, the state now virtually handed a completed agenda to the Hindu communalists. Ironically, all this was subsequently defended in the name of Hinduism as at once a culture and a cultural synthesis. When the reform proposal was discussed in the Lok sabha it was claimed that Hinduism was not a religion but a culture, a synthesis of the varied beliefs, customs and practices of different people. The Hindu as legal entity became difficult to distinguish from the one that described by the Hindu Mahasabha.

 

 Voice raised by;

Ajmer Singh Randhawa.

Congratulations, Today Khalsa was created and a new year begins too;

March 31, 2014
ImageBecause the year began in March, records referring to the “first month” pertain to March; to the second month pertain to April, etc., so that “the 19th of the 12th month” would be February 19. In fact, in Latin, September means seventh month, October means eighth month, November means ninth month, and December means tenth month. Use of numbers, rather than names, of months was especially prevalent in Quaker records.The Gregorian Calendar
During the Middle Ages, it began to became apparent that the Julian leap year formula had overcompensated for the actual length of a solar year, having added an extra day every 128 years. However, no adjustments were made to compensate. By 1582, seasonal equinoxes were falling 10 days “too early,” and some church holidays, such as Easter, did not always fall in the proper seasons. In that year, Pope Gregory XIII authorized, and most Roman Catholic countries adopted, the “Gregorian” or “New Style” Calendar.” As part of the change, ten days were dropped from the month of October, and the formula for determining leap years was revised so that only years divisible by 400 (e.g., 1600, 2000) at the end of a century would be leap years. January 1 was established as the first day of the new year. Protestant countries, including England and its colonies, not recognizing the authority of the Pope, continued to use the Julian Calendar.Double Dating
Between 1582 and 1752, not only were two calendars in use in Europe (and in European colonies), but two different starts of the year were in use in England. Although the “Legal” year began on March 25, the use of the Gregorian calendar by other European countries led to January 1 becoming commonly celebrated as “New Year’s Day” and given as the first day of the year in almanacs.

To avoid misinterpretation, both the “Old Style” and “New Style” year was often used in English and colonial records for dates falling between the new New Year (January 1) and old New Year (March 25), a system known as “double dating.” Such dates are usually identified by a slash mark [/] breaking the “Old Style” and “New Style” year, for example, March 19, 1631/2. Occasionally, writers would express the double date with a hyphen, for example, March 19, 1631-32. In general, double dating was more common in civil than church and ecclesiastical records.

Changes of 1752
In accordance with a 1750 act of Parliament, England and its colonies changed calendars in 1752. By that time, the discrepancy between a solar year and the Julian Calendar had grown by an additional day, so that the calendar used in England and its colonies was 11 days out-of-sync with the Gregorian Calendar in use in most other parts of Europe.

England’s calendar change included three major components. The Julian Calendar was replaced by the Gregorian Calendar, changing the formula for calculating leap years. The beginning of the legal new year was moved from March 25 to January 1. Finally, 11 days were dropped from the month of September 1752.

The changeover involved a series of steps:

December 31, 1750 was followed by January 1, 1750 (under the “Old Style” calendar, December was the 10th month and January the 11th) March 24, 1750 was followed by March 25, 1751 (March 25 was the first day of the “Old Style” year) December 31, 1751 was followed by January 1, 1752 (the switch from March 25 to January 1 as the first day of the year) September 2, 1752 was followed by September 14, 1752 (drop of 11 days to conform to the Gregorian calendar)

Courtesy: http://www.ctstatelibrary.org/node/2218 Now due to the actual length of a solar year, having added an extra day every 128 years. The day of creation of khalsa now falls on 14th April every year whereas if changes are not accepted it should fall today on 31st March.
So as per these changes, one day is added after every 128 years, since 1752, two more days are added in calender means the total days added are 14 till date, hence Khalsa was created on 31st March 1699 as per calculations made on behalf of changes made by Pope Gregory in 1752.

In next century in the year 2126 this day may fall on 15th April.

So i congratulate whole Khalsa Panth on creation of khalsa this day 31st March 1699 and seek blessings of Khalsa panth for more enlightenment and naam daan. I bow before you with due regards.

An authentic report of on creation of Khaalsa by a spy of Mogul emperor Aurangzeb (eye witness account);

“On this day, Guru Ji prepared a new nectar. There were about 35 to 40 thousand people present in the gathering to hear the Guru. The Mughalsa at the time had four thrones; Delhi, Agra, Lahore and Klanaur; but the throne of the Guru at Anandpur had its own typical glamour. This throne beat all the Mogul thrones in their splendour. That day the Guru wore a gorgeous dress. He came into the court and unsheathed his sword and in a loud voice said, “I need one head”, without any hesitation Bhai Daya Ram came forward and offered himself for the sacrifice.

The Guru, in front of the whole congregation, struck Daya Ram’s head off with the sword and severed it from the body. The audience was stunned and speechless.

The Guru said again, “I need another head”, immediately Bhai Dharam Chand stood up and bowed to the Guru. The Guru severed his head too in one stroke. The audience panicked and started leaving the court. The Guru asked for another head and one after the other beheaded three more devotes, Himmat Rai, Mohkham Chand and Sahib Chand. Numerous individuals went to the Guru’s mother and narrated the whole episode.

The Guru then cleaned and washed the five corpses and their severed heads. He also cleaned the floor so that no mark of blood was left anywhere. Then Guru Ji placed the severed heads with one and other heads and the bodies and covered them with white sheets.

He called for a big stone and put on it a steel bowl which had no handles. He poured water into the the bowl and started churning it into nectar. Guru Ji stirred the nectar with the sword and recited holy words. This went on for about half an hour. At that time, a woman perhaps elated to the Prophet, came forward and put something into the bowl. Now the nectar was ready.

The Guru then sat towards the heads of the corpses. He uncovered their faces and first put some nectar in Bhai Daya Ram’s mouth and sprinkled it into his head and then all over his body and said, “Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa;Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh”. Immediately Bhai Daya Ram Ji became alive, stood up and repeated the words after the Guru.

The whole congregation went pale with fear. Despite many thousand present no one could breathe loudily. They all had frozen under the spell of the Guru’s miracle.

I (Abu-ul-Turani) was very much impressed and my heart grieved to be under the Guru’s guidance and with a lump in my throat, I too approached the Guru and begged him to bless me with the nectar. The Guru smilingly obliged and initiated me and named me Ajmer Singh, thus with the Guru’s blessing I attained eternal bliss.

This was the last report I ever sent to Aurangzeb in which I also mentioned that the Guru is ‘God’ and warned Aurangzeb that this enmity towards the Guru will lead to the downfall and destruction of his empire.”

If we look at Pranchin Panth Prakash written by Rattan Singh Bhangu, it refers to an eyewitness account of the amrit sanchar that took place in 1699, by one, Ab-Ul-Tarani. In addition, Bhai Vir Singh Ji also mention of  Abu-ul-Tarani, in his works Dasmesh Chamatkar. Both of these texts above suggest that Abu-ul-Tarani was a spy on behalf of the Emperor Aurengzeb in the court of the Guru for two years.

Ajmer Singh Randhawa.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 621 other followers